Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253548›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2024

Satisfaction with remote consultations in primary care during COVID-19: a population survey of UK adults.

Kate J Lifford, Detelina Grozeva, Rebecca Cannings-John, Harriet Quinn-Scoggins, Yvonne Moriarty, Ardiana Gjini, Mark Goddard, Julie Hepburn, Jacqueline Hughes, Graham Moore and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. What patients want from access to UK general practice: systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Kate J LiffordPRIME Centre Wales, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0002-9782-2080
Detelina GrozevaCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0003-3239-8415
Rebecca Cannings-JohnCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0001-5235-6517
Harriet Quinn-ScogginsPRIME Centre Wales, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0002-6136-070X
Yvonne MoriartyCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0002-7608-4699
Ardiana GjiniPublic Health Wales; senior lecturer, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Mark GoddardCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Julie HepburnPublic Involvement Community, Health and Care Research Wales Support Centre, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0001-7684-0506
Jacqueline HughesCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff.
Graham MooreDECIPHer (Centre for Development, Evaluation, Complexity and Implementation in Public Health Improvement), School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0002-6136-3978
Kirstie OsborneSocial & Behavioural Research, Cancer Research UK, London.
Michael RoblingCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0002-1004-036X
Julia TownsonCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0001-8679-3619
Jo WallerCentre for Cancer Screening, Prevention and Early Diagnosis, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London; reader of cancer screening & early diagnosis, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London.ORCID 0000-0003-4025-9132
Victoria WhitelockSocial & Behavioural Research, Cancer Research UK, London.ORCID 0000-0001-8604-4490
Katriina L WhitakerSchool of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford.ORCID 0000-0002-0947-1840
Kate BrainDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff.ORCID 0000-0001-9296-9748
Cardiff University · GBCancer Research UK · GBUniversity of Wales Institute Cardiff · SGHealth and Care Research Wales · GBPublic Health Wales · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Surrey · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMode of access to primary care changed during the COVID-19 pandemic; remote consultations became more widespread. With remote consultations likely to continue in UK primary care, it is important to understand people's perceptions of remote consultations and identify potential resulting inequalities.

aimTo assess satisfaction with remote GP consultations in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify demographic variation in satisfaction levels. DESIGN AND

settingA cross-sectional survey from the second phase of a large UK-based study, which was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodIn total, 1426 adults who self-reported having sought help from their doctor in the past 6 months completed an online questionnaire (February to March 2021). Items included satisfaction with remote consultations and demographic variables. Associations were analysed using multivariable regression.

resultsA novel six-item scale of satisfaction with remote GP consultations had good psychometric properties. Participants with higher levels of education had significantly greater satisfaction with remote consultations than participants with mid-level qualifications (

conclusionThese findings can inform the use and adaptation of remote consultations in primary care. Adults with lower educational levels may need additional support to improve their experience and ensure equitable care via remote consultations.

Indexed as

COVID-19Remote ConsultationTelemedicineAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsPersonal SatisfactionPrimary Health CareScotlanddemographic factorsgeneral practiceprimary health careremote consultationstelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38253548
PMCPMC10824329
OpenAlexW4387330731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.