Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253532›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2024

Striatal and Behavioral Responses to Reward Vary by Socioeconomic Status in Adolescents.

Alexandra L Decker, Steven L Meisler, Nicholas A Hubbard, Clemens C C Bauer, Julia Leonard, Hannah Grotzinger, Melissa A Giebler, Yesi Camacho Torres, Andrea Imhof, Rachel Romeo and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. How childhood adversity affects components of decision making.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra L DeckerMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 alexandraleerdecker@gmail.com.
Steven L MeislerMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-8888-1572
Nicholas A HubbardDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588.
Clemens C C BauerMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.ORCID 0000-0002-3481-4438
Julia LeonardDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06511.
Hannah GrotzingerDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106.
Melissa A GieblerTeachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027.
Yesi Camacho TorresMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.
Andrea ImhofDepartment of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403.
Rachel RomeoDepartments of Human Development & Quantitative Methodology and Hearing & Speech Sciences, and Program in Neuroscience & Cognitive Science, University of Maryland College Park, Baltimore, Maryland 20742.
John D E GabrieliMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139.
McGovern Institute for Brain Research · USColumbia University · USHarvard University · USNortheastern University · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · USUniversity of Oregon · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disparities in socioeconomic status (SES) lead to unequal access to financial and social support. These disparities are believed to influence reward sensitivity, which in turn are hypothesized to shape how individuals respond to and pursue rewarding experiences. However, surprisingly little is known about how SES shapes reward sensitivity in adolescence. Here, we investigated how SES influenced adolescent responses to reward, both in behavior and the striatum-a brain region that is highly sensitive to reward. We examined responses to both immediate reward (tracked by phasic dopamine) and average reward rate fluctuations (tracked by tonic dopamine) as these distinct signals independently shape learning and motivation. Adolescents (

Indexed as

Corpus StriatumDopamineAdolescentFemaleHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMotivationRewardDopamineadolescencedecision-makingresponse timerewardsocioeconomic statusstriatum

Identifiers

PMID38253532
PMCPMC10941242
OpenAlexW4391093191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.