Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253447›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2024

Managing transitions from external assistance: cross-national learning about sustaining effective coverage.

Zubin Cyrus Shroff, Susan P Sparkes, Ligia Paina, Maria Skarphedinsdottir, George Gotsadze, Henry Zakumumpa, Kun Tang, Prasadini N Perera, MyMai Yuan, Kara Hanson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Still rethinking external assistance for health.Health policy and planning · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Zubin Cyrus ShroffORCID 0000-0002-0582-8582
Susan P SparkesWorld Health Organization, Department of Health Financing and Economics, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3289-5745
Ligia PainaDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, Baltimore 21205, USA.
Maria SkarphedinsdottirUHC 2030, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
George GotsadzeCuratio International Foundation, Georgia and Ilia State University, 0179 Kavsadze str. 3, Office 5, Tbilisi, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-8429-7125
Henry ZakumumpaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, Makerere University, School of Public Health, 7062 University Rd, Kampala, Uganda.
Kun TangVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, 30 Shuangqing Rd, Haidian District, Beijing 100190, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5444-186X
Prasadini N PereraInstitute for Health Policy, 72, Park Street, Colombo 2, Sri Lanka.
MyMai YuanWorld Health Organization, Department of Health Financing and Economics, World Health Organization, Avenue Appia 20, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Kara HansonFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The often-prominent role of external assistance in health financing in low- and middle-income countries raises the question of how such resources can enable the sustained or even expanded coverage of key health services and initiatives even after donor funding is no longer available. In response to this question, this paper analyses the process and outcomes of donor transitions in health-where countries or regions within countries are no longer eligible to receive grants or concessional loans from external sources based on eligibility criteria or change in donor policy. The comparative analysis of multiple donor transitions in four countries-China, Georgia, Sri Lanka and Uganda-identifies 16 factors related to policy actors, policy process, the content of donor-funded initiatives and the broader political-economic context that were associated with sustained coverage of previously donor supported interventions. From a contextual standpoint, these factors relate to favourable economic and political environments for domestic systems to prioritize coverage for donor-supported interventions. Clear and transparent transition processes also enabled a smoother transition. How the donor-supported initiatives and services were organized within the context of the overall health system was found to be critically important, both before and during the transition process. This includes a targeted approach to integrate, strengthen and align key elements of the governance, financing, input management and service delivery arrangements with domestic systems. The findings of this analysis have important implications for how both donors and country policy makers can better structure external assistance that enables sustained coverage regardless of the source of funding. In particular, donors can better support sustained coverage through supporting long-term structural and institutional reform, clear co-financing policies, ensuring alignment with local salary scales and engaging with communities to ensure a continued focus on equitable access post-transition.

Indexed as

Administrative PersonnelHealth FacilitiesChinaHealthcare FinancingHumansPolicyDonor transitionexternal assistance, UHCsustainabilitytransition

Identifiers

PMID38253447
PMCPMC10977916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.