Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253441›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2024

External technical assistance and its contribution to donor transition and long-term sustainability: experience from China and Georgia.

Aidan Huang, Chunkai Cao, Yingxi Zhao, Giorgi Soselia, Maia Uchaneishvili, Ivdity Chikovani, George Gotsadze, Mohan Lyu, Kun Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Still rethinking external assistance for health.Health policy and planning · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aidan HuangVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, No. 30 Shuangqing Road, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4602-3913
Chunkai CaoVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, No. 30 Shuangqing Road, Beijing 100084, China.
Yingxi ZhaoVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, No. 30 Shuangqing Road, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4937-4703
Giorgi SoseliaSchool of Natural Sciences and Medicine, Ilia State University, Kakutsa Cholokashvili Ave 3/5, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia.
Maia UchaneishviliSchool of Natural Sciences and Medicine, Ilia State University, Kakutsa Cholokashvili Ave 3/5, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia.
Ivdity ChikovaniSchool of Natural Sciences and Medicine, Ilia State University, Kakutsa Cholokashvili Ave 3/5, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia.
George GotsadzeSchool of Natural Sciences and Medicine, Ilia State University, Kakutsa Cholokashvili Ave 3/5, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia.ORCID 0000-0002-8429-7125
Mohan LyuVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, No. 30 Shuangqing Road, Beijing 100084, China.
Kun TangVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, No. 30 Shuangqing Road, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5444-186X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

External technical assistance has played a vital role in facilitating the transitions of donor-supported health projects/programmes (or their key components) to domestic health systems in China and Georgia. Despite large differences in size and socio-political systems, these two upper-middle-income countries have both undergone similar trajectories of 'graduating' from external assistance for health and gradually established strong national ownership in programme financing and policymaking over the recent decades. Although there have been many documented challenges in achieving effective and sustainable technical assistance, the legacy of technical assistance practices in China and Georgia provides many important lessons for improving technical assistance outcomes and achieving more successful donor transitions with long-term sustainability. In this innovation and practice report, we have selected five projects/programmes in China and Georgia supported by the following external health partners: the World Bank and the UK Department for International Development, Gavi Alliance and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. These five projects/programmes covered different health focus areas, ranging from rural health system strengthening to opioid substitution therapy. We discuss three innovative practices of technical assistance identified by the cross-country research teams: (1) talent cultivation for key decision-makers and other important stakeholders in the health system; (2) long-term partnerships between external and domestic experts; and (3) evidence-based policy advocacy nurtured by local experiences. However, the main challenge of implementation is insufficient domestic budgets for capacity building during and post-transition. We further identify two enablers for these practices to facilitate donor transition: (1) a project/programme governance structure integrated into the national health system and (2) a donor-recipient dynamic that enabled deep and far-reaching engagements with external and domestic stakeholders. Our findings shed light on the practices of technical assistance that strengthen long-term post-transition sustainability across multiple settings, particularly in middle-income countries.

Indexed as

BudgetsCapacity BuildingChinaGeorgia (Republic)HumansChinadevelopment assistance for healthdonor transitionExternal technical assistanceGeorgiamiddle-income countriessustainability

Identifiers

PMID38253441
PMCPMC10803192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.