Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253400›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2024

Multidimensional factors of burnout in general practice: a cross sectional survey.

Marie Bayot, Anke Boone, Lode Godderis, Anne-Laure Lenoir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marie BayotDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium marie.bayot@uliege.be.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9789-532X
Anke BooneCentre for Environment and Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4075-3571
Lode GodderisCentre for Environment and Health, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4764-8835
Anne-Laure LenoirDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3059-2911
University of Liège · BECentre for Environment Education · INEuropean External Action Service · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGPs are particularly vulnerable to job burnout. Tailored prevention and intervention strategies are needed.

aimTo investigate organisational, interpersonal, and individual factors contributing to exhaustion and disengagement at work among GPs. DESIGN &

settingWe conducted a cross-sectional study in a sample of Belgian GPs.

methodA total of 358 doctors (73% females, 301 with complete data) completed an online anonymous questionnaire assessing job burnout, psychosocial characteristics of the work environment, perceived social support in the private domain, emotional competence, and self-compassion.

resultsGPs reported moderate levels of exhaustion and disengagement. Regression models showed that included factors jointly explained 69% of the variance in exhaustion and 63% in disengagement. Exhaustion was significantly predicted by female sex (

conclusionOrganisational, interpersonal, and intrapersonal factors interact to predict a substantial part of burnout in general practice. The most significant risk factors were perceived work-life conflict and poor meaning of work. Policymakers should work to support more sustainable practices based on the specific needs and constraints reported by GPs.

Indexed as

Belgiumemotional intelligencegeneral practitionersjob burnoutmental healthself-compassionsocial supportworking conditions

Identifiers

PMID38253400
PMCPMC11300977
OpenAlexW4391111097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.