Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38253327›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024

Conservation of Hot Spots and Ligand Binding Sites in Protein Models by AlphaFold2.

Ayse A Bekar-Cesaretli, Omeir Khan, Thu Nguyen, Dima Kozakov, Diane Joseph-Mccarthy, Sandor Vajda

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. bindNode24: Competitive binding residue prediction with 60 % smaller model.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ayse A Bekar-CesaretliDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States.
Omeir KhanDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5822-1549
Thu NguyenDepartment of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States.
Dima KozakovDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States.
Diane Joseph-MccarthyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States.
Sandor VajdaDepartment of Chemistry, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1540-8220
Boston University · USStony Brook University · US

Funding

Analysis and Prediction of Molecular InteractionsR35GM118078 · NIGMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI SANDOR VAJDA · 2016 to 2026
$6.5M
Mechanism of Slow Onset Enzyme Inhibition and Translation to Time-Dependent Drug ActivityR01GM102864 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI TONGE, PETER J · 2012 to 2021
$2.6M
Simulation of Multi-Protein systemsR01GM140098 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI KOZAKOV, DMYTRO · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102864NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140098NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM118078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural network-based program AlphaFold2 (AF2) provides high accuracy structure prediction for a large fraction of globular proteins. An important question is whether these models are accurate enough for reliably docking small ligands. Several recent papers and the results of CASP15 reveal that local conformational errors reduce the success rates of direct ligand docking. Here, we focus on the ability of the models to conserve the location of binding hot spots, regions on the protein surface that significantly contribute to the binding free energy of the protein-ligand interaction. Clusters of hot spots predict the location and even the druggability of binding sites, and hence are important for computational drug discovery. The hot spots are determined by protein mapping that is based on the distribution of small fragment-sized probes on the protein surface and is less sensitive to local conformation than docking. Mapping models taken from the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database show that identifying binding sites is more reliable than docking, but the success rates are still 5% to 10% lower than based on mapping X-ray structures. The drop in accuracy is particularly large for models of multidomain proteins. However, both the model binding sites and the mapping results can be substantially improved by generating AF2 models for the ligand binding domains of interest rather than the entire proteins and even more if using forced sampling with multiple initial seeds. The mapping of such models tends to reach the accuracy of results obtained by mapping the X-ray structures.

Indexed as

FurylfuramideMembrane ProteinsBinding SitesLigandsProtein BindingProtein ConformationFurylfuramideLigandsMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID38253327
PMCPMC10922769
OpenAlexW4391116940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.