ArticleAnnals of internal medicine2024
Talking With Patients About the New Anti-amyloid Alzheimer Disease Medications.
Article in Annals of internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk of New Indications for Anticoagulants and Thrombolytics in People With Cognitive Impairment: Implications for Anti-Amyloid Therapy.Neurology · 2026Observational
- Ethical challenges in the clinical translation of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies for Alzheimer's disease: a scoping review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Scaling Alzheimer's Care: The Case for Specialized Treatment Clinics.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Disparities in Early Lecanemab Uptake Among US Medicare Beneficiaries.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- A qualitative study of people with Alzheimer's disease in a memory clinic considering lecanemab treatment.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Use of lecanemab and donanemab in the Canadian healthcare system: Evidence, challenges, and areas for future research.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Review
- Characterizing clinician communication with patients about lecanemab: A qualitative study of clinicians across seven academic medical centers.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.