ArticleBiochemistry2024
Contrasting Effects of Cancer-Associated Mutations in EphA3 and EphB2 Kinases.
Article in Biochemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Erythropoietin-producing hepatoma (Eph) receptors are a family of tyrosine kinases that can act as tumor promoters or tumor suppressors, depending on the receptor and cancer cell type. Cancer-associated somatic mutations have been identified in all Eph receptors, but in most cases, the functional effects of the mutations are unknown. In this study, we expressed and purified the kinase domains of wild-type (WT) EphA3 and EphB2 along with 16 cancer-associated mutants. We identified mutations that decrease EphA3 activity and both activating and inhibitory mutations in EphB2. To shed light on the mechanisms by which the mutations altered kinase activity, we measured the thermal stabilities of the enzymes and performed steady-state kinetic experiments. We also expressed the full-length receptors in HEK293T cells to determine the cellular effects. WT EphB2 promoted downstream ERK signaling, while a kinase-inactive mutant (S706F) was similar to the control cells. In contrast, WT EphA3 (but not loss-of-function mutants) inhibited ERK signaling. The reciprocal effects of EphB2 and EphA3 on ERK phosphorylation in HEK293T cells were also evident in Ras-GTP loading. Thus, consistent with the dual roles of Eph receptors as tumor promoters and tumor suppressors, somatic mutations have the potential to increase or decrease Eph function, resulting in changes in the downstream signaling transduction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.