Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252839›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

The planetary commons: A new paradigm for safeguarding Earth-regulating systems in the Anthropocene.

Johan Rockström, Louis Kotzé, Svetlana Milutinović, Frank Biermann, Victor Brovkin, Jonathan Donges, Jonas Ebbesson, Duncan French, Joyeeta Gupta, Rakhyun Kim and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Housing tenure, climate resilience, and ecological segregation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Risk management during times of health uncertainty in Spain: A qualitative analysis of ethical challenges.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Pathogens and planetary change.Nature reviews. Biodiversity · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Carbon reduction and water saving potentials for growing corrugated boxes for express delivery services in China.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Johan RockströmPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam 14473, Germany.
Louis KotzéFaculty of Law, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2531, South Africa.
Svetlana MilutinovićPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam 14473, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6462-6083
Frank BiermannCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CB, The Netherlands.
Victor BrovkinMax Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg 20146, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6420-3198
Jonathan DongesPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam 14473, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5233-7703
Jonas EbbessonDepartment of Law, Stockholm University, Stockholm 11419, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0004-5984-9700
Duncan FrenchCollege of Health and Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, United Kingdom.
Joyeeta GuptaFaculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1012 WP, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1424-2660
Rakhyun KimCopernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1308-6849
Timothy LentonGlobal Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6725-7498
Dominic LenziDepartment of Philosophy, University of Twente, Enschede 7522 NB, The Netherlands.
Nebojsa NakicenovicInternational Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg A-2361, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-7176-4604
Barbara NeumannFaculty of Economics and Social Sciences, Research Institute for Sustainability Helmholtz Center Potsdam, Potsdam 14467, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0015-2314
Fabian SchuppertPotsdam University, Potsdam 14469, Germany.
Ricarda WinkelmannPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam 14473, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1248-3217
Klaus BosselmannFaculty of Law, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
Carl FolkeStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm 10691, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4050-3281
Wolfgang LuchtPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam 14473, Germany.
David SchlosbergFaculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Sydney Environment Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Camperdown NSW 2050, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3547-919X
Katherine RichardsonGlobe Institute, Faculty of Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1172, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-3785-2787
Will SteffenFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1163-6736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Anthropocene signifies the start of a no-analogue trajectory of the Earth system that is fundamentally different from the Holocene. This new trajectory is characterized by rising risks of triggering irreversible and unmanageable shifts in Earth system functioning. We urgently need a new global approach to safeguard critical Earth system regulating functions more effectively and comprehensively. The global commons framework is the closest example of an existing approach with the aim of governing biophysical systems on Earth upon which the world collectively depends. Derived during stable Holocene conditions, the global commons framework must now evolve in the light of new Anthropocene dynamics. This requires a fundamental shift from a focus only on governing shared resources beyond national jurisdiction, to one that secures critical functions of the Earth system irrespective of national boundaries. We propose a new framework-the planetary commons-which differs from the global commons framework by including not only globally shared geographic regions but also critical biophysical systems that regulate the resilience and state, and therefore livability, on Earth. The new planetary commons should articulate and create comprehensive stewardship obligations through Earth system governance aimed at restoring and strengthening planetary resilience and justice.

Indexed as

AnthropoceneEarth system governanceglobal commonsinternational lawplanetary boundaries

Identifiers

PMID38252839
PMCPMC10835110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.