Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252813›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2024

A virtual phantom for patient-specific QA On A 1.5T MR-linac.

Mingshuo Ji, Zhenjiang Li, Yuan Tian, Ke Zhang, Minghui Li, Yan Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. A virtual phantom for patient-specific QA On A 1.5T MR-linac.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mingshuo JiElekta, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6819-9761
Zhenjiang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences (SDCH), Jinan, China.
Yuan TianDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National, Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of, Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, (CAMS), Beijing, Beijing, China.
Ke ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National, Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of, Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, (CAMS), Beijing, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9977-4166
Minghui LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National, Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of, Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, (CAMS), Beijing, Beijing, China.
Yan ChenElekta Ltd. Asia Pacific, Hongkong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Create a virtual ArcCHECK-MR phantom, customized for a 1.5T MR-linac, with consideration of the different density regions within the quality assurance (QA) phantom, aiming to streamline the utilization of this specialized QA device. A virtual phantom was constructed in the treatment planning system (TPS) to replicate the ArcCHECK-MR's composition, consisting of five distinct layers: "Outer" (representing the outer PMMA ring), "Complex" (simulating the printed circuit boards), "Detectors" (encompassing the detector area), "Inner" (signifying the inner PMMA ring) and "Insert" (representing the PMMA insert). These layers were defined based on geometric data and represented as contour points on a set of dummy CT images. Additionally, a setup platform was integrated as contoured structures. To determine the relative electron density (RED) values of the external and internal PMMA components, measurements were taken at 25 points in the insert using an ion chamber. A novel method for establishing the exit/entrance dose ratio (EEDR) for ArcCHECK-MR was introduced. The RED of higher density region was derived by evaluating the local gamma index passing rate results with criteria of 2% dose difference and 2 mm distance-to-agreement. The performance of the virtual phantom was assessed for Unity 7 FFF beams with a 1.5T magnetic field. The radii of the five ring structures within the virtual phantom measured 133.0 mm, 110.0 mm, 103.4 mm, 100.0 mm, and 75.0 mm for the "Outer," "Complex," "Detectors," "Inner" and "Insert" regions, respectively. The RED values were as follows: ArcCHECK-MR PMMA had a RED of 1.130, "Detectors" were assumed to have a RED of 1.000, "Complex" had a RED of 1.200, and the setup QA phantom justified a RED of 1.350. Early validation results demonstrate that the 5-layer virtual phantom, when compared to the commonly used bulk overridden phantom, offers improved capability in MR-linac environments. This enhancement led to an increase in passing rates for the local gamma index by approximately 5 ∼ 6%, when applying the criteria of 2%, 2 mm. We have successfully generated a virtual representation of the distinct regions within the ArcCHECK-MR using a TPS, addressing the challenges associated with its use in conjunction with a 1.5T MR-linac. We consistently observed favorable local gamma index passing rates across two 1.5T MR-linac and ArcCHECK-MR unit combinations. This approach has the potential to minimize uncertainties in the creation of the QA phantom for ArcCHECK-MR across various institutions.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingParticle AcceleratorsPhantoms, ImagingQuality Assurance, Health CareRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHumansNeoplasmsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedArcCHECK‐MRMR‐linacpatient‐specific quality assuranceplan verificationradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38252813
PMCPMC11087164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.