Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252633›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Using hybrid pre-trained models for breast cancer detection.

Sameh Zarif, Hatem Abdulkader, Ibrahim Elaraby, Abdullah Alharbi, Wail S Elkilani, Paweł Pławiak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sameh ZarifDepartment of Information Technology, Faculty of Computers and Information, Menoufia University, Shebin El-kom, Menoufia, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-8644-4478
Hatem AbdulkaderDepartment of Information Systems, Faculty of Computers and Information, Menoufia University, Shebin El-kom, Menoufia, Egypt.
Ibrahim ElarabyDepartment of Information Systems Management, Higher Institute of Qualitative Studies, Cairo, Egypt.
Abdullah AlharbiDepartment of Computer Science, Community College, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Wail S ElkilaniCollege of Applied Computer Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Paweł PławiakDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Computer Science and Telecommunications, Cracow University of Technology, Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4317-2801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a prevalent and life-threatening disease that affects women globally. Early detection and access to top-notch treatment are crucial in preventing fatalities from this condition. However, manual breast histopathology image analysis is time-consuming and prone to errors. This study proposed a hybrid deep learning model (CNN+EfficientNetV2B3). The proposed approach utilizes convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for the identification of positive invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and negative (non-IDC) tissue using whole slide images (WSIs), which use pre-trained models to classify breast cancer in images, supporting pathologists in making more accurate diagnoses. The proposed model demonstrates outstanding performance with an accuracy of 96.3%, precision of 93.4%, recall of 86.4%, F1-score of 89.7%, Matthew's correlation coefficient (MCC) of 87.6%, the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve of 97.5%, and the Area Under the Curve of the Precision-Recall Curve (AUPRC) of 96.8%, which outperforms the accuracy achieved by other models. The proposed model was also tested against MobileNet+DenseNet121, MobileNetV2+EfficientNetV2B0, and other deep learning models, proving more powerful than contemporary machine learning and deep learning approaches.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma in SituArea Under CurveBreastFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID38252633
PMCPMC10802945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.