SynthesisPLoS computational biology2024
Integrated meta-analysis of colorectal cancer public proteomic datasets for biomarker discovery and validation.
Synthesis in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- MLMarker: a machine learning framework for tissue inference and biomarker discovery.Genome biology · 2026Article
- Review
- The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2026: making proteomics data FAIR.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Expression Atlas in 2026: enabling FAIR and open expression data through community collaboration and integration.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Amniotic Fluid Extracellular Vesicle Properties Evolve With Gestational Age and Reflect Fetal Development.Journal of extracellular biology · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Oncological Biomarker Framework Guiding Precision Medicine.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Bioinformatics and experimental insights into F2RL1 as a key biomarker in cervical cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrated View of Baseline Protein Expression in Human Tissues Using Public Data Independent Acquisition Data Sets.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- The PRIDE database at 20 years: 2025 update.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Integrated Proteomics Analysis of Baseline Protein Expression in Pig Tissues.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Advances in Precision Medicine Approaches for Colorectal Cancer: From Molecular Profiling to Targeted Therapies.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2024Review
- The role and mechanism of TXNDC5 in disease progression.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cancer biomarker field has been an object of thorough investigation in the last decades. Despite this, colorectal cancer (CRC) heterogeneity makes it challenging to identify and validate effective prognostic biomarkers for patient classification according to outcome and treatment response. Although a massive amount of proteomics data has been deposited in public data repositories, this rich source of information is vastly underused. Here, we attempted to reuse public proteomics datasets with two main objectives: i) to generate hypotheses (detection of biomarkers) for their posterior/downstream validation, and (ii) to validate, using an orthogonal approach, a previously described biomarker panel. Twelve CRC public proteomics datasets (mostly from the PRIDE database) were re-analysed and integrated to create a landscape of protein expression. Samples from both solid and liquid biopsies were included in the reanalysis. Integrating this data with survival annotation data, we have validated in silico a six-gene signature for CRC classification at the protein level, and identified five new blood-detectable biomarkers (CD14, PPIA, MRC2, PRDX1, and TXNDC5) associated with CRC prognosis. The prognostic value of these blood-derived proteins was confirmed using additional public datasets, supporting their potential clinical value. As a conclusion, this proof-of-the-concept study demonstrates the value of re-using public proteomics datasets as the basis to create a useful resource for biomarker discovery and validation. The protein expression data has been made available in the public resource Expression Atlas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.