Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252521›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2024

Systematic transition from boundary extension to contraction along an object-to-scene continuum.

Jeongho Park, Emilie Josephs, Talia Konkle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jeongho ParkDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Emilie JosephsComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Talia KonkleDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Cognitive and Neural Representations of Reachable EnvironmentsR21EY031867 · NEI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI KONKLE, TALIA · 2020 to 2021
$460k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY031867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After viewing a picture of an environment, our memory of it typically extends beyond what was presented, a phenomenon referred to as boundary extension. But, sometimes memory errors show the opposite pattern-boundary contraction-and the relationship between these phenomena is controversial. We constructed virtual three-dimensional environments and created a series of views at different distances, from object close-ups to wide-angle indoor views, and tested for memory errors along this object-to-scene continuum. Boundary extension was evident for close-scale views and transitioned parametrically to boundary contraction for far-scale views. However, this transition point was not tied to a specific position in the environment (e.g., the point of reachability). Instead, it tracked with judgments of the best-looking view of the environment, in both rich-object and low-object environments. We offer a dynamic-tension account, where competition between object-based and scene-based affordances determines whether a view will extend or contract in memory. This study demonstrates that boundary extension and boundary contraction are not two separate phenomena but rather two parts of a continuum, suggesting a common underlying mechanism. The transition point between the two is not fixed but depends on the observer's judgment of the best-looking view of the environment. These findings provide new insights into how we perceive and remember a view of environment.

Indexed as

JudgmentMental RecallHumans

Identifiers

PMID38252521
PMCPMC10810016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.