Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252483›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Uncovering Language Disparity of ChatGPT on Retinal Vascular Disease Classification: Cross-Sectional Study.

Xiaocong Liu, Jiageng Wu, An Shao, Wenyue Shen, Panpan Ye, Yao Wang, Juan Ye, Kai Jin, Jie Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xiaocong Liu *Eye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5323-2954
Jiageng Wu *School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0984-0818
An ShaoEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1795-4877
Wenyue ShenEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1352-9419
Panpan YeEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8165-023X
Yao WangEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7258-6093
Juan YeEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1948-2500
Kai JinEye Center, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4369-2417
Jie YangSchool of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5696-363X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBenefiting from rich knowledge and the exceptional ability to understand text, large language models like ChatGPT have shown great potential in English clinical environments. However, the performance of ChatGPT in non-English clinical settings, as well as its reasoning, have not been explored in depth.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate ChatGPT's diagnostic performance and inference abilities for retinal vascular diseases in a non-English clinical environment.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, we collected 1226 fundus fluorescein angiography reports and corresponding diagnoses written in Chinese and tested ChatGPT with 4 prompting strategies (direct diagnosis or diagnosis with a step-by-step reasoning process and in Chinese or English).

resultsCompared with ChatGPT using Chinese prompts for direct diagnosis that achieved an F

conclusionsChatGPT can serve as a helpful medical assistant to provide diagnosis in non-English clinical environments, but there are still performance gaps, language disparities, and errors compared to professionals, which demonstrate the potential limitations and the need to continually explore more robust large language models in ophthalmology practice.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ErrorsFluorescein AngiographyLanguageRetinal DiseasesVascular DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansartificial intelligenceChatGPTclinical decision supportlarge language modelsretinal vascular disease

Identifiers

PMID38252483
PMCPMC10845019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.