Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252475›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Acceptability and Feasibility of a Smartphone-Based Real-Time Assessment of Suicide Among Black Men: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Leslie B Adams, Thomasina Watts, Aubrey DeVinney, Emily E Haroz, Johannes Thrul, Jasmin Brooks Stephens, Mia N Campbell, Denis Antoine, Benjamin Lê Cook, Sean Joe and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Investigating the Role of Racism in Black Men's Suicide: Revisiting the Interpersonal-Psychological Theory of Suicide.Archives of suicide research : official journal of the International Academy for Suicide Research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leslie B AdamsDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4956-271X
Thomasina WattsDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4312-5204
Aubrey DeVinneyDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0907-3751
Emily E HarozDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1833-4925
Johannes ThrulDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8929-9579
Jasmin Brooks StephensDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4222-5721
Mia N CampbellDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7472-5819
Denis AntoineDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6814-0961
Benjamin Lê CookDepartment of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0135-0806
Sean JoeGeorge Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University at St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-5501
Roland J ThorpeDepartment of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4448-4997
Johns Hopkins University · USCambridge Health Alliance · USUniversity of Houston · US

Funding

Why Place MattersU54MD000214 · NIMHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI THORPE, ROLAND J. · 2017 to 2022
$8.8M
Stress and Mortality Among Black MenK02AG059140 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI THORPE, ROLAND J. · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
Uncovering proximal antecedents to Black male suicide using real-time approachesK01MH127310 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Leslie Bernice Adams · 2022 to 2026
$984k
NIA NIH HHS K02 AG059140NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD000214NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH127310NIMH NIH HHS L60 MH134779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide rates in the United States have increased recently among Black men. To address this public health crisis, smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) platforms are a promising way to collect dynamic, real-time data that can help improve suicide prevention efforts. Despite the promise of this methodology, little is known about its suitability in detecting experiences related to suicidal thoughts and behavior (STB) among Black men.

objectiveThis study aims to clarify the acceptability and feasibility of using smartphone-based EMA through a pilot study that assesses the user experience among Black men.

methodsWe recruited Black men aged 18 years and older using the MyChart patient portal messaging (the patient-facing side of the Epic electronic medical record system) or outpatient provider referrals. Eligible participants self-identified as Black men with a previous history of STB and ownership of an Android or iOS smartphone. Eligible participants completed a 7-day smartphone-based EMA study. They received a prompt 4 times per day to complete a brief survey detailing their STB, as well as proximal risk factors, such as depression, social isolation, and feeling like a burden to others. At the conclusion of each day, participants also received a daily diary survey detailing their sleep quality and their daily experiences of everyday discrimination. Participants completed a semistructured exit interview of 60-90 minutes at the study's conclusion.

resultsIn total, 10 participants completed 166 EMA surveys and 39 daily diary entries. A total of 4 of the 10 participants completed 75% (21/28) or more of the EMA surveys, while 9 (90%) out of 10 completed 25% (7/28) or more. The average completion rate of all surveys was 58% (20.3/35), with a minimum of 17% (6/35) and maximum of 100% (35/35). A total of 4 (40%) out of 10 participants completed daily diary entries for the full pilot study. No safety-related incidents were reported. On average, participants took 2.08 minutes to complete EMA prompts and 2.72 minutes for daily diary surveys. Our qualitative results generally affirm the acceptability and feasibility of the study procedures, but the participants noted difficulties with the technology and the redundancy of the survey questions. Emerging themes also addressed issues such as reduced EMA survey compliance and diminished mood related to deficit-framed questions related to suicide.

conclusionsFindings from this study will be used to clarify the suitability of EMA for Black men. Overall, our EMA pilot study demonstrated mixed feasibility and acceptability when delivered through smartphone-based apps to Black men. Specific recommendations are provided for managing safety within these study designs and for refinements in future intervention and implementation science research. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/31241.

Indexed as

acceptabilitybehaviorBlack menecological momentary assessmentfeasibilityimplementationinterventionmixed methodsmobile phonereal-time assessmentsmartphonesuicidesuicide preventionuser experience

Identifiers

PMID38252475
PMCPMC10845025
OpenAlexW4391102410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.