Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252391›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2024

Evaluating Provider and Pharmacy Discordance in Potential Calcium Channel Blocker-Loop Diuretic Prescribing Cascade.

Asinamai M Ndai, Earl J Morris, Almut G Winterstein, Scott M Vouri

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Real-World Complexity of Prescribing Cascades.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Asinamai M NdaiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, PO Box 100496, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Earl J MorrisDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, PO Box 100496, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Almut G WintersteinDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, PO Box 100496, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Scott M VouriDepartment of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, University of Florida College of Pharmacy, PO Box 100496, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. svouri@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0411-2160
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Preventing the Calcium Channel Blocker – Lower Extremity Edema – Loop Diuretic Prescribing Cascade in Older AdultsK08AG066854 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI VOURI, SCOTT MARTIN · 2021 to 2022
$324k
NIA NIH HHS K08AG066854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescribing cascades occur when a drug-induced adverse event is treated with a new medication. Identifying clinical scenarios in which prescribing cascades are more likely to occur may help determine ways to prevent prescribing cascades.

objectiveTo understand the extent to which discordant providers and discordant pharmacies contribute to the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (DH CCB)-loop diuretic prescribing cascade. STUDY POPULATION AND

designA retrospective cohort study using Medicare Fee-For-Service data (2011-2018) of adults aged ≥ 66 years. EXPOSURES: Patients who initiated DH CCB with subsequent initiation of loop diuretic (DH CCB-loop diuretic dyad) within 90 days or patients who initiated angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) with subsequent initiation of a loop diuretic (ACEI/ARB-loop diuretic dyad; control). MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes were provider and pharmacy discordance for prescribing cascades and control drug pairs. Baseline clinical and socio-demographic characteristics were balanced using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores.

resultsOverall, we identified 1987 DH CCB-loop diuretic dyads and 3148 ACEI/ARB-loop diuretic dyads. Discordant providers occurred in 64% of DH CCB-loop diuretic dyads and 55% of ACEI/ARB-loop diuretic dyads, while discordant pharmacies occurred in 19% of DH CCB-loop diuretic dyads and 16% of ACEI/ARB-loop diuretic dyads. After adjustment, the risk of having discordant providers was 20% {Relative Risk (RR) 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14-1.26]} higher in the DH CCB-loop diuretic dyad compared with the ACEI/ARB-loop diuretic dyad. Moreover, pharmacy discordance was 17% (RR 1.17 [95% CI 1.02-1.33]) higher.

conclusionOur findings suggest that discordant providers and discordant pharmacies were more commonly involved in the potential prescribing cascade when compared with a similar control dyad of medications. Opportunities for enhanced care coordination and medication reconciliation should be explored to prevent unnecessary polypharmacy.

Indexed as

HypertensionPharmaciesPharmacyAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCalcium Channel BlockersHumansMedicareRetrospective StudiesSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsUnited StatesAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCalcium Channel BlockersSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID38252391
OpenAlexW4391103225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.