ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2024
Reconstructive interpolation for pulse wave estimation to improve local PWV measurement of carotid artery.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- [A multi-source information fusion-based method for the local pulse wave velocity estimation in carotid artery].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026Article
- Real-time beat-to-beat pulse wave velocity estimation: a quality-driven approach using laser Doppler vibrometry.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasonic transit time (TT)-based local pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurement is defined as the distance between two beam positions on a segment of common carotid artery (CCA) divided by the TT in the pulse wave propagation. However, the arterial wall motions (AWMs) estimated from ultrasonic radio frequency (RF) signals with a limited number of frames using the motion tracking are typically discrete. In this work, we develop a method involving motion tracking combined with reconstructive interpolation (MTRI) to reduce the quantification errors in the estimated PWs, and thereby improve the accuracy of the TT-based local PWV measurement for CCA. For each beam position, normalized cross-correlation functions (NCCFs) between the reference (the first frame) and comparison (the remaining frames) RF signals are calculated. Thereafter, the reconstructive interpolation is performed in the neighborhood of the NCCFs' peak to identify the interpolation-deduced peak locations, which are more exact than the original ones. According to which, the improved AWMs are obtained to calculate their TT along a segment of the CCA. Finally, the local PWV is measured by applying a linear regression fit to the time-distance result. In ultrasound simulations based on the pulse wave propagation models of young, middle-aged, and elderly groups, the MTRI method with different numbers of interpolated samples was used to estimate AWMs and local PWVs. Normalized root mean squared errors (NRMSEs) between the estimated and preset values of the AWMs and local PWVs were calculated and compared with ones without interpolation. The means of the NRMSEs for the AWMs and local PWVs based on the MTRI method with one interpolated sample decrease from 1.14% to 0.60% and 7.48% to 4.61%, respectively. Moreover, Bland-Altman analysis and coefficient of variation were used to validate the performance of the MTRI method based on the measured local PWVs of 30 healthy subjects. In conclusion, the reconstructive interpolation for the pulse wave estimation improves the accuracy and repeatability of the carotid local PWV measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38252371What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.