ArticleMolecular biology reports2024
An accretive detection method for in silico identification and validation of circular RNAs in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using RT-qPCR.
Article in Molecular biology reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circular RNAs in Plasma and Beyond: Potential Biomarkers for Breast Cancer.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Elucidating circRNA-miRNA-mRNA competing endogenous regulatory RNA network during leaf rust pathogenesis in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.).Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCircular RNAs (circRNAs) are novel class of non-coding RNAs, which are involved in various functions at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level in response to a fungal pathogen (Puccinia triticina), including microRNA (miRNA) sponge, RNA binding proteins sponge, regulation of parental gene and biomarkers. Detailed analysis of wheat circRNAs is essential to accelerate the regulated expression of fungal miRNAs. Therefore, we suggest a protocol to aid circRNA identification through RNA-Seq data using various algorithms based on perl script followed by validation through divergent primer designing, standard PCR, and RT-qPCR assays. METHODS AND
resultThe divergent primer has been widely used to detect, validate, and quantify back-spliced junction (BSJ) of circRNAs. The procedure covers index file formation, circRNA identification and BSJ detections. However, the laboratory validation of circRNA includes wheat genomic DNA isolation, RNA isolation and its cDNA conversion upto validation. In this study, we identified 28 circRNAs from RNA-Seq of S0 and R0, wherein six circRNAs are commonly present and 75% of the identified circRNAs were belongs to inter-genic, 14% were exonic and intronic category were 11%. Divergent primer designing method successfully validated the two circRNAs via RT-qPCR assay, where circRNA_2 showed less relative expression pattern than circRNA_1 in contrast with housekeeping genes.
conclusionThus, our results of identified and validated circRNAs showed that, this protocol is quite helpful, relatively easy, reliable, and accurate for large datasets as other algorithms need various dependencies and have complex scripts with high chances of error occurrence. Additionally, analysis time will vary depending on the expertise level and the number of RNA-Seq data. This proposed protocol can also be used for a wide range of monocotyledons belonging to the Poaceae plant family.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.