ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2024
Do soleus responses to transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation show similar changes to H-reflex in response to Achilles tendon vibration?
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Excitability of posterior root reflex evoked by transcutaneous spinal stimulation is distinct from the H-reflex in the soleus muscle: a pulse duration study.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Use of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation to explore inhibitory and facilitatory circuits in muscles of the human lower limb.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Postsynaptic potentials of soleus motor neurons produced by transspinal stimulation: a human single-motor unit study.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction/purposeRecently, the use of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS) has been proposed as a viable alternative to the H-reflex. The aim of the current study was to investigate to what extent the two modes of spinal cord excitability investigation would be similarly sensitive to the well-known vibration-induced depression.
methodsFourteen healthy participants (8 men and 6 women; age: 26.7 ± 4.8 years) were engaged in the study. The right soleus H-reflex and TSCS responses were recorded at baseline (PRE), during right Achilles tendon vibration (VIB) and following 20 min of vibration exposure (POST-VIB). Care was taken to match H-reflex and TSCS responses amplitude at PRE and to maintain effective stimulus intensities constant throughout time points.
resultsThe statistical analysis showed a significant effect of time for the H-reflex, with VIB (13 ± 5% of maximal M-wave (M
conclusionWhile the sensitivity of TSCS seems to be similar to the gold standard H-reflex to highlight the vibratory paradox, both responses showed different sensitivity to the effects of prolonged vibration, suggesting slightly different pathways may actually contribute to evoked responses of both stimulation modalities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38252303What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.