Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252259›Full record

ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2024

Ureterocalicostomy for complex upper ureteral stricture: a narrative review of the current literature.

Bin Xie, Xuefeng Wang, Xin Zeng, Lingyu Xie, Zhicheng Zeng, Hui Xu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bin Xie *First Clinical Medical College, The Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Xuefeng Wang *First Clinical Medical College, The Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Xin ZengFirst Clinical Medical College, The Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Lingyu XieFirst Clinical Medical College, The Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Zhicheng ZengFirst Clinical Medical College, The Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China.
Hui XuUrology Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, China. 18970796298@189.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9891-8893
Gannan Medical University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University · CN

Funding

the Science and Technology Program of Jiangxi Provincial Health Commission 20204482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper ureteral stricture is a relatively rare but increasingly encountered condition in clinical practice. While simple stricture can often be addressed through endoluminal treatment or surgical reconstruction, complex upper ureteral stricture poses challenges, particularly in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) or perirenal pelvic fibrosis and scarring resulting from previous surgeries. These cases present difficulties for traditional endoluminal and ureteral reconstruction treatments, posing a significant problem for many clinical surgeons. Our study involved a thorough search and comprehensive analysis of the existing literature on Ureterocalicostomy (UC). The literature indicates that UC is a safe and effective treatment for ureteral stenosis. By resecting the renal lower pole parenchyma, it is possible to achieve mucosal anastomosis between the calyceal and ureteral mucosa, leading to the restoration of normal urinary excretion. This technique has emerged as an alternative for treating complex upper ureteral strictures. However, there is a lack of direct comparative studies between open surgery and minimally invasive surgery. Our findings revealed a scarcity of relevant review documents, with most being case reports or retrospective studies conducted in single centers with small sample sizes. Therefore, it is crucial to conduct large-scale, multicenter prospective studies and long-term follow-up to validate the long-term efficacy of UC. This article reviews the development history of UC and focuses on a comprehensive discussion of its indications, surgical techniques, and complications.

Indexed as

Ureteral ObstructionConstriction, PathologicHumansKidney CalicesUreterUrologic Surgical ProceduresUpper ureteral strictureUreteral reconstructionUreterocalicostomyUreteropelvic junction obstruction

Identifiers

PMID38252259
PMCPMC11090920
OpenAlexW4391105720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.