Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252250›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2024

Implementation of Direct-to-Patient Mobile Teledermatology in VA.

Sara B Peracca, Olevie Lachica, Rebecca P Lamkin, George L Jackson, David C Mohr, Heather A King, John D Whited, Allene S Fonseca, Isis J Morris, Allen L Gifford and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03241589 (Teledermatology Mobile Apps), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03241589 completednot on this map

Teledermatology Mobile Apps: Implementation and Impact on Veterans' Access to Dermatology

TypeobservationalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2019 to 2020Enrolled466ConditionsIntroduction of Teledermatology Mobile AppsArmsDirect to patient facing mobile apps introduction
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Sara B PeraccaDermatology Service (190), San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA.
Olevie LachicaDermatology Service (190), San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA.
Rebecca P LamkinCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
George L JacksonCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
David C MohrCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Heather A KingCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
John D WhitedCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Allene S FonsecaDepartment of Dermatology, Wayne State University, 18101 Oakwood Boulevard #402, Dearborn, MI, 48124, USA.
Isis J MorrisCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Allen L GiffordCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Martin A WeinstockDepartment of Dermatology and Epidemiology, Brown University, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI, 02903, USA.
Dennis H OhDermatology Service (190), San Francisco VA Health Care System, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA. Dennis.Oh@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0001-7712-4421
Boston University · USDuke University · USSan Francisco VA Health Care System · USBrown University · USDurham VA Health Care System · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USVA Boston Healthcare System · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Teledermatology mobile apps: Implementation and impact on Veterans' access to dermatologyI01HX002450 · VA · VETERANS AFFAIRS MED CTR SAN FRANCISCO · PI OH, DENNIS H, WEINSTOCK, MARTIN A. · 2018 to 2020
–
Improving dermatology access by direct-to-patient teledermatology and computer-assisted diagnosisI01HX003473 · VA · VETERANS AFFAIRS MED CTR SAN FRANCISCO · PI DENNIS H OH, MARTIN A. WEINSTOCK · 2021 to 2026
–
HSRD VA CIN 13-410HSRD VA I01 HX002450HSRD VA I01 HX003473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInnovative technology can enhance patient access to healthcare but must be successfully implemented to be effective.

objectiveWe evaluated Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA's) implementation of My VA Images, a direct-to-patient asynchronous teledermatology mobile application enabling established dermatology patients to receive follow-up care remotely instead of in-person. DESIGN /PARTICIPANTS/APPROACH: Following pilot testing at 3 facilities, the app was introduced to 28 facilities (4 groups of 7) every 3 months using a stepped-wedge cluster-randomized design. Using the Organizational Theory of Implementation Effectiveness, we examined the app's implementation using qualitative and quantitative data consisting of encounter data from VA's corporate data warehouse; app usage from VA's Mobile Health database; bi-monthly reports from facility representatives; phone interviews with clinicians; and documented communications between the operational partner and facility staff. KEY

resultsImplementation policies and practices included VA's vision to expand home telehealth and marketing/communication strategies. The COVID-19 pandemic dominated the implementation climate by stressing staffing, introducing competing demands, and influencing stakeholder attitudes to the app, including its fit to their values. These factors were associated with mixed implementation effectiveness, defined as high quality consistent use. Nineteen of 31 exposed facilities prepared to use the app; 10 facilities used it for actual patient care, 7 as originally intended. Residents, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants were more likely than attendings to use the app. Facilities exposed to the app pre-pandemic were more likely to use and sustain the new process.

conclusionsConsiderable heterogeneity existed in implementing mobile teledermatology, despite VA's common mission, integrated healthcare system, and stakeholders' broad interest. Identifying opportunities to target favorable facilities and user groups (such as teaching facilities and physician extenders, respectively) while addressing internal implementation barriers including incomplete integration with the electronic health record as well as inadequate staffing may help optimize the initial impact of direct-to-patient telehealth. The COVID pandemic was a notable extrinsic barrier. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03241589.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mobile ApplicationsTelemedicineHumansPandemicsasynchronous caredermatologydirect-to-consumer teledermatologyimplementation sciencemobile teledermatologytelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38252250
PMCPMC10937882
OpenAlexW4391108233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.