Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252247›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2024

Informational Postcards Increase Engagement with Remote Monitoring Among Veterans with Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: a Stepped-Wedge Randomized Controlled Trial.

Megan M McLaughlin, Merritt H Raitt, Gary Tarasovsky, Mary A Whooley, Sanket S Dhruva

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Megan M McLaughlinSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Merritt H RaittPortland Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA.
Gary TarasovskySan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mary A WhooleySan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Sanket S DhruvaSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA. sanket.dhruva2@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-0674-2032
University of California, San Francisco · USSan Francisco VA Health Care System · USVA Portland Health Care System · US

Funding

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BASIS OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASET32HL007731 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Brian L Black · 1992 to 2026
$12.4M
Measurement Science QUERII50HX003266 · VA · VETERANS AFFAIRS MED CTR SAN FRANCISCO · PI COHEN, BETH, KALTENBACH, TONYA R · 2021 to 2021
–
Improving Safety of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in VeteransIK2HX003357 · VA · VETERANS AFFAIRS MED CTR SAN FRANCISCO · PI Sanket S Dhruva · 2022 to 2026
–
HSRD VA I50 HX003266HSRD VA IK2 HX003357NHLBI NIH HHS 5T32HL007731-30NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRemote monitoring (RM) of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduces morbidity and mortality. However, many patients are not adherent to RM.

objectiveTo test the effect of informational postcards on RM adherence. DESIGN/PATIENTS: Stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial among Veterans with pacemakers and ICDs.

interventionIn wave 1, Veterans who had sent at least 1 transmission within the past 2 years but had become non-adherent were randomly assigned to receive a postcard or no postcard. Those receiving postcards were randomized to 1 of 2 messages: (1) a"warning" postcard describing risks of non-adherence or (2) an "encouraging" postcard describing benefits of adherence. In wave 2, Veterans who had either not received a postcard in wave 1 or had since become non-adherent were mailed a postcard (again, randomized to 1 of 2 messages). Patients who did not send an RM transmission within 1 month were mailed a second, identical postcard. MAIN MEASURES: Transmission within 70 days. KEY

resultsOverall, 6351 Veterans were included. In waves 1 and 2, postcards were mailed to 5657 Veterans (2821 "warning" messages and 2836 "encouraging" messages). Wave 1 included 2178 Veterans as controls (i.e., not mailed a postcard), some of whom received a postcard in wave 2 if they remained non-adherent. In wave 2, 3473 postcards were sent. Of the 5657 patients mailed a postcard, 2756 (48.7%) sent an RM transmission within 70 days, compared to 530 (24.3%) of 2178 controls (absolute difference 24.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.2%, 26.6%). Of those who sent a transmission, 71.8% did so after the first postcard. Transmission rates at 70 days did not significantly differ between "warning" and "encouraging" messages (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.92, 1.18).

conclusionsInformational postcards led to a 24.4% absolute increase in adherence at 70 days among Veterans with pacemakers and ICDs who were non-adherent to RM.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantablePacemaker, ArtificialVeteransHumansadherenceICDimplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorspacemakersremote monitoring

Identifiers

PMID38252247
PMCPMC10937872
OpenAlexW4391109631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.