Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252238›Full record

ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2024

Defining and Improving Outcomes Measurement for Virtual Care: Report from the VHA State-of-the-Art Conference on Virtual Care.

Samantha L Connolly, Scott E Sherman, Navid Dardashti, Elizabeth Duran, Hayden B Bosworth, Michael E Charness, Terry J Newton, Ashok Reddy, Edwin S Wong, Leah L Zullig and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha L ConnollyCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA. samantha.connolly@va.gov.
Scott E ShermanVirtual Care Consortium of Research (VC CORE), VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, USA.
Navid DardashtiVirtual Care Consortium of Research (VC CORE), VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth DuranVirtual Care Consortium of Research (VC CORE), VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY, USA.
Hayden B BosworthCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Michael E CharnessChief of Staff of the VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA.
Terry J NewtonDirector of Clinical Analytics, VA Office of Connected Care, Washington, DC, USA.
Ashok ReddyGeneral Medicine Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Edwin S WongCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
Leah L ZulligCenter of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jeydith GutierrezCenter for Access and Delivery Research, Iowa City VA Healthcare System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
VA NY Harbor Healthcare System · USBoston University · USDuke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · USIowa City VA Health Care System · USNew York University · USUniversity of Washington · USVA Boston Healthcare System · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs HSRD COR 20-199
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual care, including synchronous and asynchronous telehealth, remote patient monitoring, and the collection and interpretation of patient-generated health data (PGHD), has the potential to transform healthcare delivery and increase access to care. The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Office of Health Services Research and Development (HSR&D) convened a State-of-the-Art (SOTA) Conference on Virtual Care to identify future virtual care research priorities. Participants were divided into three workgroups focused on virtual care access, engagement, and outcomes. In this article, we report the findings of the Outcomes Workgroup. The group identified virtual care outcome areas with sufficient evidence, areas in need of additional research, and areas that are particularly well-suited to be studied within VHA. Following a rigorous process of literature review and consensus, the group focused on four questions: (1) What outcomes of virtual care should we be measuring and how should we measure them?; (2) how do we choose the "right" care modality for the "right" patient?; (3) what are potential consequences of virtual care on patient safety?; and (4) how can PGHD be used to benefit provider decision-making and patient self-management?. The current article outlines key conclusions that emerged following discussion of these questions, including recommendations for future research.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareTelemedicineConsensusHumans

Identifiers

PMID38252238
PMCPMC10937867
OpenAlexW4391108759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.