Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252199›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2024

Does robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty restore native joint line more accurately than with conventional instruments?

P S Ashok Kumar, Sawankumar Pawar, Kalaivanan Kanniyan, Suryanarayan Pichai, Vijay C Bose, Shantanu Patil

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Accuracy of ROSAJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Image-based robotics enhance precision and efficiency in lateral UKA: A comparative study of 135 UKAs.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Article
  4. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: evidence from a national database.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

P S Ashok KumarOrthopaedics Asian Joint Reconstruction institute SIMS, Metro No.1 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Vadapalani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600026, India.
Sawankumar PawarOrthopaedics Asian Joint Reconstruction institute SIMS, Metro No.1 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Vadapalani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600026, India. drsawanortho@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2834-6970
Kalaivanan KanniyanOrthopaedics Asian Joint Reconstruction institute SIMS, Metro No.1 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Vadapalani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600026, India.
Suryanarayan PichaiOrthopaedics Asian Joint Reconstruction institute SIMS, Metro No.1 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Vadapalani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600026, India.
Vijay C BoseOrthopaedics Asian Joint Reconstruction institute SIMS, Metro No.1 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Vadapalani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600026, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5511-6922
Shantanu PatilOrthopaedics Asian Joint Reconstruction institute SIMS, Metro No.1 Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Vadapalani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600026, India.
Jawaharlal Nehru University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study's primary aim is the restoration of native joint line in patients having robotic-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty and conventional unicondylar knee arthroplasty. Literature in the past has demonstrated that reducing the joint line can result in greater failure rates. This is a prospective cohort investigation of patients who had medial UKA between March 2017 and March 2022.All patient's pre-operative and post-operative radiological joint line assessments were examined by two observers by Weber's methods. Robotic-assisted UKA performed with hand-held image-free robots was compared to conventional UKA groups. The distal position of the femoral component was higher in Group B utilizing conventional tools than in Group A employing robotic-assisted UKA. This positional difference was statistically significant. The mean difference among the pre-operative and post-operative joint lines in Group A was 1.6 ± 0.49 (range 0.8 mm-2.4 mm), while it was 2.47 ± 0.51 (range 1.6 mm-3.9 mm) (p 0.005) in Group B. In Group A, a greater percentage of the subjects (64%) attained a femoral component position within two millimeters from the joint line, whereas just 18% in Group B did. When compared with the conventional UKA technique, the meticulous attention to detail and planning for ligament rebalancing when using the robotic-assisted UKA technique not solely enhance surgical precision for implant placing but additionally provides excellent native joint line restoration and balancing. For validation of its longevity and survivability, the cohort must be tracked for a longer period of time.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansLigamentsPostoperative PeriodProspective StudiesConventional UKAJoint line restorationRobotic UKA

Identifiers

PMID38252199
OpenAlexW4391099759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.