Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38252189›Full record

Trial reportAging clinical and experimental research2024

TECH preserves global cognition of older adults with MCI compared with a control group: a randomized controlled trial.

Noa Givon Schaham, Zvi Buckman, Debbie Rand

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06805578 (Exploring and Evaluating the Impact of 'Refresh and Reconnect!'), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06805578 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Exploring and Evaluating the Impact of 'Refresh and Reconnect!': A Museum-based Heritage Programme for Older Persons With Cognitive Impairment

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolRan2025 to 2026Enrolled108ConditionsMild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), Ageing, Mild Dementia, Well-beingArmsHeritage art programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noa Givon SchahamDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Steyer School of Health Professions, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2600-3870
Zvi BuckmanMaccabi Healthcare Services, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1836-9386
Debbie RandDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Steyer School of Health Professions, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. drand@tauex.tau.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6410-2389

Funding

Bader Philanthropies, Inc. 17131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive training using touchscreen tablet casual game applications (apps) has potential to be an effective treatment method for people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

aimsThis study aimed to establish the effectiveness of 'Tablet Enhancement of Cognition and Health' (TECH), a novel cognitive intervention for improving/preserving cognition in older adults with MCI.

methodsA single-blind randomized controlled trial with assessments pre-, post-, and at 6-month follow-up was conducted. TECH entailed 5 weeks of daily self-training utilizing tablet apps, facilitated by weekly group sessions. Global cognition was assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and specific cognitive components were assessed using WebNeuro computerized battery. Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Intention-to-treat analysis was conducted and the %change was calculated between pre-post and between pre-follow-up. Cohen's d effect size was also calculated.

resultsSixty-one participants aged 65-89 years were randomly allocated to TECH (N = 31, 14 women) or to standard care (N = 30, 14 women). Pre-post and pre-follow-up MoCA %change scores were significantly higher in TECH than control (U = 329.5, p < .05; U = 294.5, p < .05) with intermediate effect size values (Cohen's d = .52, Cohen's d = .66). Forty percent of TECH participants versus 6.5% of control participants achieved a minimal clinical important difference in MoCA. Pre-post between-group differences for specific cognitive components were not found and HRQoL did not change. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionsTECH encouraged daily self-training and showed to preserve global cognition of older adults with MCI. The implementation of TECH is recommended for older adults with MCI, who are at risk for further cognitive decline.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionQuality of LifeAgedCognitionFemaleHealth SurveysHumansSingle-Blind MethodCognitive trainingiPadTabletTechnology

Identifiers

PMID38252189
PMCPMC10803538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.