ArticleArchives of microbiology2024
Investigation of potential rubber-degrading bacteria and genes involved.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
COVID-19 pandemic has generated high demand for natural rubber gloves (NR) leading to crucial issues of rubber waste and waste management such as burning, dumping, stockpiling, discarding waste in landfills. Hence, rubber biodegradation by microorganisms is an alternative solution to the problem. The biodegradation method is environmentally friendly but normally extremely slow. Numerous microorganisms can degrade NR as a source of carbon and energy. In this study, Rhodococcus pyridinivorans KU1 was isolated from the consortium CK from previous study. The 40% rubber weight loss was detected after incubated for 2 months. The bacterial colonization and cavities on the surface of rubber were identified using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The result demonstrated the critical degradation of the rubber surface, indicating that bacteria can degrade rubber and use it as their sole carbon source. The result of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed a gene that is 99.9% identical to lcp which is responsible for poly (cis-1,4-isoprene) degradation. The results from Meta16S rRNA sequencing showed that the microbial communities were slightly shifted during the 2-month degradation, depending on the presence of monomers or oligomers appeared during the degradation process. The majority of species were soil bacteria such as phylum Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes. Members of Pseudoxanthomonas seemed to be the dominant degraders throughout the degradation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38252137What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.