Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38251740›Full record

Trial reportAge and ageing2024

A stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial to assess efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a care-bundle to prevent falls in older hospitalised patients.

Gianfranco Di Gennaro, Liliya Chamitava, Paolo Pertile, Elisa Ambrosi, Daniela Mosci, Alice Fila, Mulubirhan Assefa Alemayohu, Lucia Cazzoletti, Stefano Tardivo, Maria Elisabetta Zanolin

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Age and ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gianfranco Di GennaroDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro, Italy.
Liliya ChamitavaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Paolo PertileDepartment of Economics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Elisa AmbrosiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Daniela MosciHospital Hygiene and Prevention, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alice FilaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Mulubirhan Assefa AlemayohuDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Lucia CazzolettiDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Stefano TardivoDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maria Elisabetta ZanolinDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3021-2269
University of Verona · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITMagna Graecia University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient accidental falls in a hospital environment are a serious problem for patient safety, and for the additional costs due to associated medical interventions.

objectiveThe endpoints of this study were the assessment of the fall incidence in the hospital before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary care-bundle, along with a cost-effectiveness evaluation.

designA stepped-wedge trial was conducted between April 2015 and December 2016 in Bologna University Hospital.

methodsIncidence rates (IRs) of falls in both the control and intervention periods were calculated. A multilevel mixed-effects generalised linear model with logit link function, adjusted for age, sex, cluster cross-over timing and patients' clinical severity was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) of fall risk of patients of the intervention group respect to the controls.Intervention costs associated with the introduction of the care-bundle intervention were spread between patients per cluster-period-group of exposure. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was evaluated using total costs in the intervention and control groups.

resultsIRs of falls in control and intervention periods were respectively 3.15 and 2.58 for 1,000 bed-days. After adjustment, the subjects receiving the intervention had a statistically significant reduced risk of falling with respect to those who did not (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.84). According to the cost-effectiveness analysis, the incremental cost per fall prevented was €873.92 considering all costs, and €1644.45 excluding costs related falls.

conclusionsCare-bundle had a protective effect on patients, with a statistically significant reduction of the fall risk. This type of intervention appears cost-effective compared to routine practices.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsCost-Effectiveness AnalysisAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisHospitals, UniversityHumansLinear Modelscare-bundle interventioncost-effectiveness analysisfalls in hospitalolder peoplestepped-wedge design

Identifiers

PMID38251740
PMCPMC10801830
OpenAlexW4391109611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.