Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38251457›Full record

SynthesisOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2024

The first step in developing an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Vision Loss: A systematic review.

Lorenzo Billiet, Ruth M A van Nispen, Stijn De Baets, Ralph de Vries, Dominique Van de Velde, Hilde P A van der Aa

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Evolving Landscape of Vision Rehabilitation: Current Status and Future Directions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Development of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Vision Loss: Insights From the Lived Experience of People With Vision Loss.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lorenzo BillietOphthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8389-9311
Ruth M A van NispenOphthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1227-1177
Stijn De BaetsFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences - Occupational Therapy Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6856-5305
Ralph de VriesMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2075-7495
Dominique Van de VeldeFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences - Occupational Therapy Research Group, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6982-1075
Hilde P A van der AaOphthalmology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1853-5674

Funding

ZonMw programma Inzicht 94314003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimAs a first step in developing an International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for adults with vision loss, this systematic review sought to identify the researchers' perspective by identifying the most often used outcome measures and research topics obtained from studies on adults with vision loss.

methodsPubMed, Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched for studies on vision loss. Meaningful outcome measures and research topics were linked to the ICF components: environmental factors, body functions, body structures and the Activities and Participation life domains.

resultsAfter deduplication, 7219 records remained, of which 2328 articles were eligible for further review. For feasibility reasons, approximately 20% were randomly chosen from every publication year, resulting in 446 included articles. After full-text reading, 349 articles remained, describing 753 outcome measures based on questionnaires and 2771 additional research topics that could be linked to the ICF. Most were linked to the component Activities and Participation, with a focus on recreation and leisure activities (ICF code d920, 70%), reading (d166, 34%) and driving (d475, 27%). For the component body function, seeing functions (b210, 83%) were most often reported. Outcome measures and research topics were least often linked to the body structure component and environmental factors.

conclusionThe broad range of ICF categories identified in this systematic review represents the variety of functioning typical for adults with vision loss. These results reflect the focus of researchers over the past 21 years by using various vision-related outcomes. In our next steps to develop the ICF Core Set for Vision Loss, we will include perspectives of experts and lived experience.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthActivities of Daily LivingBlindnessHumansPersons with DisabilitiesQuality of LifeVision Disordersactivitiesdisability and healthICFICF Core SetInternational Classification of Functioningparticipationvision loss

Identifiers

PMID38251457
PMCPMC12872645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.