Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38251263›Full record

ReviewToxins2024

Mycotoxins-Imprinted Polymers: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Simone Cavalera, Laura Anfossi, Fabio Di Nardo, Claudio Baggiani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Simone CavaleraLaboratory of Bioanalytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5353-647X
Laura AnfossiLaboratory of Bioanalytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2920-0140
Fabio Di NardoLaboratory of Bioanalytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0497-4251
Claudio BaggianiLaboratory of Bioanalytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Torino, 10125 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1024-2532

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycotoxins are toxic metabolites of molds which can contaminate food and beverages. Because of their acute and chronic toxicity, they can have harmful effects when ingested or inhaled, posing severe risks to human health. Contemporary analytical methods have the sensitivity required for contamination detection and quantification, but the direct application of these methods on real samples is not straightforward because of matrix complexity, and clean-up and preconcentration steps are needed, more and more requiring the application of highly selective solid-phase extraction materials. Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs) are artificial receptors mimicking the natural antibodies that are increasingly being used as a solid phase in extraction methods where selectivity towards target analytes is mandatory. In this review, the state-of-the-art about molecularly imprinted polymers as solid-phase extraction materials in mycotoxin contamination analysis will be discussed, with particular attention paid to the use of mimic molecules in the synthesis of mycotoxin-imprinted materials, to the application of these materials to food real samples, and to the development of advanced extraction methods involving molecular imprinting technology.

Indexed as

MycotoxinsPolymersAntibodiesBeveragesHumansMolecularly Imprinted PolymersAntibodiesMolecularly Imprinted PolymersMycotoxinsPolymersfood analysismagnetic solid-phase extractionmimic templatemolecularly imprinted polymermycotoxinsolid-phase extractionstir bar sorptive extraction

Identifiers

PMID38251263
PMCPMC10818578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.