Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38250889›Full record

ArticleVaccines2024

Humoral Response and Safety after a Fourth Dose of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 Vaccine in Cancer Patients Undergoing Active Treatment-Results of a Prospective Observational Study.

Chiara Citterio, Claudia Biasini, Camilla Di Nunzio, Giuliana Lo Cascio, Luigi Cavanna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chiara CitterioOncology and Hematology Department, Piacenza General Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2119-775X
Claudia BiasiniOncology and Hematology Department, Piacenza General Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
Camilla Di NunzioOncology and Hematology Department, Piacenza General Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
Giuliana Lo CascioClinical Pathology Department, Piacenza General Hospital, Via Taverna 49, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3971-2008
Luigi CavannaCasa di Cura Piacenza, Internal Medicine and Oncology, Via Morigi 41, 29121 Piacenza, Italy.
Ospedaliera di Piacenza · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only a few studies have been carried out on the efficacy and safety of a fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in patients with cancer. In this prospective observational study, we aimed to assess the serological response and safety of the fourth booster shot of the BNT162b2 vaccine in 79 cancer patients, vaccinated between 1 March and 25 August 2022, under systemic anticancer therapy. The primary endpoint was to assess the increase in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies; secondary endpoints were the vaccine safety and side effects. Consequently, 40 patients (50.63%) revealed the maximum detection values in their IgG titers before the fourth dose of the vaccine, while 39 patients (49.37%) did not. Primary endpoint: Of 39 patients, 36 (92.31%) showed a significant increase in the anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers, and 32 of them (82.05%) reached the maximum titration values. Secondary endpoints: The most common adverse events were mild in severity and included injection site pain, erythema and tiredness. The majority of the adverse reactions reported were grade 1 and no grade 3 and 4 reactions were detected. Our data provide evidence that a fourth dose of the BNT162b2 anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is effective and safe in patients with solid tumors in active anticancer treatment.

Indexed as

boostercancerCOVID-19 vaccinesefficacysafety

Identifiers

PMID38250889
PMCPMC10821081
OpenAlexW4390822367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.