Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38250738›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Diagnostic value of qualitative and quantitative parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating differentiated thyroid carcinomas from benign nodules.

Jinfang Fan, Lingling Tao, Weiwei Zhan, Weiwei Li, Lijun Kuang, Yingyan Zhao, Wei Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Arrival-Time Parametric Imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Thyroid Nodule Differentiation.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinfang Fan *Department of Ultrasound, RuiJin Hospital, LuWan Branch, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Lingling Tao *Department of Ultrasound, RuiJin Hospital, LuWan Branch, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Weiwei ZhanDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Weiwei LiDepartment of Ultrasound, RuiJin Hospital, LuWan Branch, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Lijun KuangDepartment of Ultrasound, RuiJin Hospital, LuWan Branch, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Yingyan ZhaoDepartment of Ultrasound, RuiJin Hospital, LuWan Branch, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China.
Wei ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Ruijin Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of qualitative and quantitative parameters for differentiating differentiated thyroid cancers from benign nodules. Method: A total of 290 thyroid nodules that were pathologically confirmed were enrolled in this study. The univariate analysis was performed for the clinical characteristics and CEUS qualitative and quantitative parameters of the inside and peripheral zone of nodules, including age, gender, nodule size, intensity of enhancement, homogeneity, wash-in and wash-out patterns, margin after CEUS, ring enhancement, peak intensity, sharpness, time to peak(TP), and area under the curve(AUC), and the meaningful indicators in the single-factor analysis were further included in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: Multivariate analysis showed that there were significant differences in age (p=0.031), nodule size (p<0.001), heterogeneous enhancement (p<0.001), hypo-enhancement (p=0.001), unclear margin after CEUS(p=0.007), inside peak (p<0.001), and outside sharpness(p<0.001) between benign and malignant nodules. However, there were no significant differences in gender, ring enhancement, wash-in, wash-out, outside TP, outside AUC between benign and malignant thyroid nodules (P>0.05, for all). Conclusion: CEUS might be useful in the differential diagnosis of differentiated thyroid cancers and benign nodules, which could provide a certain basis for clinical treatment.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCerebellar VermisThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleHumansUltrasonographycontrast-enhanced ultrasoundqualitativequantitativethyroidthyroid carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38250738
PMCPMC10797774
OpenAlexW4390584161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.