Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38250729›Full record

SynthesisPeerJ2024

A systematic review of conference papers presented at two large Japanese psychology conferences in 2013 and 2018: did Japanese social psychologists selectively report

Kai Hiraishi, Asako Miura, Masataka Higuchi, Yoshitsugu Fujishima, Daiki Nakamura, Masaki Suyama

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kai HiraishiFaculty of Letters, Keio University, Minatoku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4486-3911
Asako MiuraGraduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7563-7503
Masataka HiguchiFaculty of Human Sciences, Sophia University, Chiyodaku, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshitsugu FujishimaFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Showa Women's University, Setagayaku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0375-6212
Daiki NakamuraFaculty of Education, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0625-6918
Masaki SuyamaFaculty of Psychology, Yasuda Women's University, Asaminamiku, Hiroshima, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of conference papers in social psychology at two large psychology conferences in Japan: the Japanese Psychological Association and the Japanese Society for Social Psychology. The conference papers were effectively not subjected to peer review; hence, they were suitable for testing if psychologists selectively reported statistically significant findings without pressure from journal editors and reviewers. We investigated the distributions of

Indexed as

Peer ReviewPsychology, SocialExistentialismJapanOptimismEvidential valueMeta-analysisp-curve analysisPublicaiton biasQuestionable research practicesReplicability crisis in psychologySelective reportingSystematic reviewz-curve analysis

Identifiers

PMID38250729
PMCPMC10800096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.