Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38250709›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2023

Estimating Causal Effects of HIV Prevention Interventions with Interference in Network-based Studies among People Who Inject Drugs.

TingFang Lee, Ashley L Buchanan, Natallia V Katenka, Laura Forastiere, M Elizabeth Halloran, Samuel R Friedman, Georgios Nikolopoulos

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

TingFang LeeDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island.
Ashley L BuchananDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island.
Natallia V KatenkaDepartment of Computer Science and Statistics, University of Rhode Island.
Laura ForastiereSchool of Public Health, Yale University.
M Elizabeth HalloranBiostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology Program, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, and Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington.
Samuel R FriedmanDepartment of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine.
Georgios NikolopoulosMedical School, University of Cyprus.
University of Rhode Island · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USNew York University · USUniversity of Cyprus · CY

Funding

Transdisciplinary Theoretical Svnthesis and Development CoreP30DA011041 · NIDA · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Holly Hagan, Courtney McKnight · 1998 to 2026
$38.9M
Causal Inference in Infectious Disease Prevention StudiesR01AI085073 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HUDGENS, MICHAEL G · 2010 to 2024
$4.5M
Preventing HIV Transmission by Recently-Infected Drug UsersDP1DA034989 · NIDA · NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI FRIEDMAN, SAMUEL R · 2012 to 2016
$3.8M
Causal Inference Methods for HIV Prevention Studies Among Networks of People Who Use DrugsDP2DA046856 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI BUCHANAN, ASHLEY LYNN · 2018 to 2019
$2.3M
Causal Inference in Infectious Disease Prevention StudiesR37AI085073 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Michael G Hudgens · 2026 to 2026
$394k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI085073NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI085073NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA034989NIDA NIH HHS DP2 DA046856NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA011041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating causal effects in the presence of interference is challenging in network-based studies of hard-to-reach populations. Like many such populations, people who inject drugs (PWID) are embedded in social networks and often exert influence on others in their network. In our setting, the study design is observational with a non-randomized network-based HIV prevention intervention. Information is available on each participant and their connections that confer possible HIV risk through injection and sexual behaviors. We considered two inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimators to quantify the population-level spillover effects of non-randomized interventions on subsequent health outcomes. We demonstrated that these two IPW estimators are consistent, asymptotically normal, and derived a closed-form estimator for the asymptotic variance, while allowing for overlapping interference sets (groups of individuals in which the interference is assumed possible). A simulation study was conducted to evaluate the finite-sample performance of the estimators. We analyzed data from the Transmission Reduction Intervention Project, which ascertained a network of PWID and their contacts in Athens, Greece, from 2013 to 2015. We evaluated the effects of community alerts on subsequent HIV risk behavior in this observed network, where the connections or links between participants were defined by using substances or having unprotected sex together. In the study, community alerts were distributed to inform people of recent HIV infections among individuals in close proximity in the observed network. The estimates of the risk differences for spillover using either IPW estimator demonstrated a protective effect. The results suggest that HIV risk behavior could be mitigated by exposure to a community alert when an increased risk of HIV is detected in the network.

Indexed as

Causal InterferenceHIV/AIDSInterference/disseminationInverse Probability WeightsNetwork StudiesPeople who Use Drugs

Identifiers

PMID38250709
PMCPMC10798667
OpenAlexW4386502131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.