Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38250687›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2024

Surgical outcomes of a prospective, phase 2 trial of robotic surgery for resectable right-sided colon cancer (the ROBOCOLO trial).

Masakatsu Numata, Jun Watanabe, Atsushi Ishibe, Mayumi Ozawa, Yusuke Suwa, Keisuke Kazama, Kazuya Nakagawa, Yosuke Atsumi, Yasushi Rino, Aya Saito and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Essential Updates 2024-2026: Advances in Colorectal Cancer Surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masakatsu NumataDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.
Jun WatanabeDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7187-3664
Atsushi IshibeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3251-3658
Mayumi OzawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama Japan.
Yusuke SuwaDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3738-9393
Keisuke KazamaDepartment of Surgery Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
Kazuya NakagawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama Japan.
Yosuke AtsumiDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.
Yasushi RinoDepartment of Surgery Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6858-3420
Aya SaitoDepartment of Surgery Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
Chikara KunisakiDepartment of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center Yokohama City University Medical Center Yokohama Japan.
Itaru EndoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine Yokohama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5520-8114
Yokohama City University · JPYokohama City University Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: We evaluated the safety of robotic surgery for right-sided colon cancer in Japan. Methods: This was a prospective, open-label, single-arm phase II trial conducted at two institutions. Patients ≥20 years old with stage I-III right-sided colon cancer and scheduled for radical resection with ≥D2 lymph node dissection were eligible. The criterion for surgeons was experience performing robot-assisted rectal resection in ≥40 cases. The primary endpoint was the postoperative complication rate ≤30 days after surgery. Results: From August 2021 to February 2023, 42 patients were enrolled; three were excluded, with 39 analyzed as the full analysis set. The median age was 72 years, and the median body mass index was 23.2. The tumor was located in the cecum in 13 cases (33.3%), ascending colon in 20 cases (51.3%), and transverse colon in six cases (15.4%). Ileocolic resection was performed in 17 cases (43.5%) and right hemicolectomy in 22 cases (56.5%), both with D3 lymph node dissection. The median console time was 109 min, and the operative time was 170 min. The mean blood loss was 7.7 mL. Intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in 28 patients (71.8%). There were no conversions and no intraoperative adverse events. The median postoperative stay was 5 days. Postoperative complications occurred in four patients (10.2%; paralytic ileus [ Conclusions: This study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery for right-sided colon cancer.

Indexed as

colon cancercomplete mesocolic excisionintracorporeal anastomosisright hemicolectomyrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID38250687
PMCPMC10797943
OpenAlexW4384825028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.