ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2024
Efficacy of lymph node dissection for duodenal cancer according to the lymph node station.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishing a standard surgery for esophagogastric junction cancer: Final results from the JGCA-JES nationwide prospective study.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Trial
- Article
- Pancreas-preserving segmental duodenectomy for duodenal malignancy: two case reports.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Impact of Tumor Location on the Efficacy of Lateral and Mesenteric Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Rectal Cancer Treated by Upfront Surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- Progress in the treatment of duodenal cancer: A comprehensive review.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Efficacy of lymph node dissection for duodenal cancer according to the lymph node station.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is associated with poor prognosis in patients with duodenal cancer (DC). However, the efficacy and optimal extent of lymph node (LN) dissection have not been thoroughly discussed. Methods: A total of 98 consecutive patients with DC who underwent surgical resection (pancreatoduodenectomy, Results: The survival of patients with LNM at the Nd stations ( Conclusions: LN dissection of the Np stations contributed to acceptable survival, whereas LNM of the Nd stations led to poor survival, possibly reflecting advanced tumor progression to systemic disease in patients with DC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.