Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38250680›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2024

Evaluating staging laparoscopy indications for pancreatic cancer based on resectability classification and treatment strategies for patients with positive peritoneal washing cytology.

Takamichi Igarashi, Mina Fukasawa, Toru Watanabe, Nana Kimura, Ayaka Itoh, Haruyoshi Tanaka, Kazuto Shibuya, Isaku Yoshioka, Kenichi Hirabayashi, Tsutomu Fujii

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Case of Successful Conversion Surgery forSurgical case reports · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takamichi IgarashiDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.
Mina FukasawaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.
Toru WatanabeDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.
Nana KimuraDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.
Ayaka ItohDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.
Haruyoshi TanakaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0079-8422
Kazuto ShibuyaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.
Isaku YoshiokaDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.
Kenichi HirabayashiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.
Tsutomu FujiiDepartment of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0625-1911
University of Toyama · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in patients with positive peritoneal washing cytology (CY1) is poor. We aimed to evaluate the results of staging laparoscopy (SL) and treatment efficacy in CY1 patients based on a resectability classification. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 250 patients with PDAC who underwent SL before the initial treatment between 2017 and 2023 at the University of Toyama. Results: The breakdown of cases by resectability classification was resectable (R):borderline resectable (BR):unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) = 131:48:71 cases. The frequency of CY1 increased in proportion to the degree of local progression (R:BR:UR-LA = 20:23:34%), but the frequencies of liver metastasis or peritoneal dissemination were comparable (R:BR:UR-LA = 6.9:6.3:8.5%). Most CY1 patients received gemcitabine along with nab-paclitaxel therapy. The CY-negative conversion rates (R:BR:UR-LA = 70:64:52%) and conversion surgery rates (R:BR:UR-LA = 40:27:9%) were inversely proportional to the degree of local progression.Comparing H0P0CY1 factors for each classification, patients with H0P0CY1 had significantly more pancreatic body or tail carcinoma and tumor size ≥32 mm in R patients, whereas in BR patients, duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-2) ≥ 230 U/mL was a significant factor. In contrast, no significant factors were observed in UR-LA patients. Conclusion: The CY1 rates, CY-negative conversion rates, and conversion surgery rates varied according to local progression. In the case of R and BR, SL could be considered in patients with pancreatic body or tail carcinoma, large tumor size, or high DUPAN-2 level. In UR-LA, SL might be considered for all patients.

Indexed as

pancreatic cancerperitoneal washing cytologystaging laparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID38250680
PMCPMC10797817
OpenAlexW4384662328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.