Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38250563›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Challenges and limitations of clinical trials in the adolescent and young adult CNS cancer population: A systematic review.

Emma M Byrne, Maeve Pascoe, Diane Cooper, Terri S Armstrong, Mark R Gilbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emma M ByrneNeuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9740-6899
Maeve PascoeNeuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Diane CooperNational Institute of Health Library, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Terri S ArmstrongNeuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Mark R GilbertNeuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2556-9722

Funding

Brain Tumor Clinical and Clinical Research Program (Clinical Support Services)ZIDBC011642 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI OZER, BYRAM · 2015 to 2025
$23.4M
Outcomes and Risk of Rare TumorsZIABC011837 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ARMSTRONG, TERRI S. · 2018 to 2024
$2.7M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer population, aged 15-39, carries significant morbidity and mortality. Despite growing recognition of unique challenges with this age group, there has been little documentation of unmet needs in their care, trial participation, and quality of life, particularly in those with primary brain tumors. Methods: A systematic literature review of 4 databases was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards. Studies included editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines on the challenges and limitations faced by the AYA population. Papers had to address CNS tumors. Results: Sixty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The challenges and limitations in clinical trials in the AYA population were synthesized into 11 categories: molecular heterogeneity, tumor biology, diagnostic delay, access to care, physician factors, patient factors, primary brain tumor (PBT) factors, accrual, limited trials, long term follow up, and trial design. The published papers' recommendations were categorized based on the target of the recommendation: providers, coordination of care, organizations, accrual, and trial design. The AYA cancer population was found to suffer from unique challenges and barriers to care and the construction of trials. Conclusions: The AYA CNS cancer population suffers from unique challenges and barriers to care and construction of trials that make it critical to acknowledge AYAs as a distinct patient population. In addition, AYAs with primary brain tumors are underrecognized and underreported in current literature. More studies in the AYA primary brain tumor patient population are needed to improve their care and participation in trials.

Indexed as

access to careadolescents and young adultsbarriers to careCNS neoplasmsoncology

Identifiers

PMID38250563
PMCPMC10798804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.