ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology
Effects of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty on Corneal Densitometry of Cases with Long-Standing Pseudophakic Bullous Keratopathy.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify the effects of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) on corneal clarity and densitometry of patients with long-standing pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) complicated with subepithelial fibrosis. Methods: Thirty-four eyes with PBK complicated with corneal edema for more than 6 months and subepithelial fibrosis were enrolled. All subjects underwent complete ophthalmic examination and corneal densitometry module of Pentacam HR, before and 1, 3, and 6 months after DSAEK. Results: Thirteen patients were excluded due to postoperative complications or missed to follow-up visits. Finally, twenty-one patients' data were analyzed. Corneal densitometry measures significantly decreased in all three layers (anterior, central, and posterior) 3 and 6 months after surgery compared to preoperative values; however, the differences did not reach statistical significance in the 1 Conclusions: Corneal densitometry in cases of PBK begins to improve after DSAEK in different layers in a slow and continued trend which takes up to 6 months for an effect to be seen. Interestingly, this improvement is possible even in complicated corneas with long-standing edema. Hence, corneal densitometry can be used as an objective method for quantification of the outcome of DSAEK in complicated cases of PBK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.