ArticleHealth science reports2024
Predominant dengue virus serotype in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A research letter on samples from 2022 outbreak.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the 2025 dengue outbreak in Bangladesh.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Observational
- Review
- Global burden of dengue from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease study 2021.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2025Article
- Molecular epidemiology of circulating dengue serotypes in Dhaka, Bangladesh: 2023 outbreak.IJID regions · 2025Article
- Clinical and Laboratory Features and Treatment Outcomes of Dengue Fever in Pediatric Cases.Cureus · 2024Article
- An effective pan-serotype dengue vaccine and enhanced control strategies could help in reducing the severe dengue burden in Bangladesh-A perspective.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Predominant dengue virus serotype in Dhaka, Bangladesh: A research letter on samples from 2022 outbreak.Health science reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.