ArticleACS omega2024
Integrated Network Pharmacology Approach to Evaluate Bioactive Phytochemicals of
Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- In-silico study of active phytochemicals and molecular mechanism of Hydrocotyle javanica Thunb.in treating MDR enterobacterial infection.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2026Article
- Synthesis, Characterization, and Inhibitory Potential of Fagonia arabica L. Phytochemicals Coated Gold Nanoparticles Against Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.Chemistry & biodiversity · 2026Article
- Identification and clinical validation of endoplasmic reticulum genes related to pulmonary tuberculosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Exploring the Therapeutic Potential ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Integrated network pharmacology, docking, MD simulations, and post-MD energy calculation revealed the nootropic effect ofIn silico pharmacology · 2025Article
- Discovery of Coumarins fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Chemoprofiling and medicinal potential of underutilized leaves of Cyperus scariosus.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.