ReviewACS omega2024
Effects of Polymers on Cement Hydration and Properties of Concrete: A Review.
Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular-Scale Regulation of Cement Hydration and Microstructure via Synergistic Aluminum Sulfate-Amide Interactions.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Influence of Water-Cement Ratio on WPU-Modified Ultrafine Cement Grouting Materials and Reinforcement Mechanism for Crushed Sandstone.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Formation and Performance of a Polymer-Cement Composite Gel in Magnesium Phosphate Cement Grouting Materials Modified by Steel Slag and Latex Powder.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Performance optimization of ultra-lightweight foamed concrete using dimethicone-infused organosilicon compound.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Influence of Initiator Content and Polymerization Conditions on the Properties of Polyacrylate Mortar.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polymer compounds have become a popular choice for the synthesis of novel products and are being used in cementitious mixtures principally for altering the properties in the fresh state and as repair materials. These polymers are used in various combinations. Their interaction with cement is worth studying because its hydration, followed by setting and hardening, is the primary phenomenon contributing to the strength gain and performance of concrete. This paper summarizes the effects of different polymers on the hydration of cement and the properties of concrete/mortar. Studies have established that the incorporation of polymers as a workability enhancing admixture or for improving strength, durability, and other properties severely affects the early hydration of cement and reduces the overall strength gain in most cases. The hydration retarding effect depends on the charge, architecture, and the amount (wt %) of polymer added. However, owing to the densification of the interfacial transition zone and formation of polymer films/bridges between stacks of calcium hydroxide surfaces and air, the later age properties show beneficial effects such as higher flexural strength, enhanced compressive strength, and modulus of elasticity, better resistance against frost, and corrosion of steel reinforcement. Further, it is seen that the hydration retardation may be mitigated to some extent by the addition of silica fume or zeolite; using a defoaming agent; curing at high temperatures; and following a combination of wet, moist, and dry curing regimes. This review is expected to be helpful to all practicing civil engineers who are the immediate users of these chemicals and are working to achieve quality concrete construction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.