Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38250407›Full record

ReviewACS omega2024

Effects of Polymers on Cement Hydration and Properties of Concrete: A Review.

Bhavna Tripathi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution.

Bhavna TripathiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Manipal University Jaipur, Dehmi Kalan, Jaipur-Ajmer Expressway, Jaipur, Rajasthan 303007, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7012-2466
Manipal University Jaipur

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polymer compounds have become a popular choice for the synthesis of novel products and are being used in cementitious mixtures principally for altering the properties in the fresh state and as repair materials. These polymers are used in various combinations. Their interaction with cement is worth studying because its hydration, followed by setting and hardening, is the primary phenomenon contributing to the strength gain and performance of concrete. This paper summarizes the effects of different polymers on the hydration of cement and the properties of concrete/mortar. Studies have established that the incorporation of polymers as a workability enhancing admixture or for improving strength, durability, and other properties severely affects the early hydration of cement and reduces the overall strength gain in most cases. The hydration retarding effect depends on the charge, architecture, and the amount (wt %) of polymer added. However, owing to the densification of the interfacial transition zone and formation of polymer films/bridges between stacks of calcium hydroxide surfaces and air, the later age properties show beneficial effects such as higher flexural strength, enhanced compressive strength, and modulus of elasticity, better resistance against frost, and corrosion of steel reinforcement. Further, it is seen that the hydration retardation may be mitigated to some extent by the addition of silica fume or zeolite; using a defoaming agent; curing at high temperatures; and following a combination of wet, moist, and dry curing regimes. This review is expected to be helpful to all practicing civil engineers who are the immediate users of these chemicals and are working to achieve quality concrete construction.

Identifiers

PMID38250407
PMCPMC10795056
OpenAlexW4390502323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.