ReviewJournal of ophthalmic & vision research
Acute Optic Neuritis: An Update on Approach and Management.
Review in Journal of ophthalmic & vision research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Plasma Exchange and Immunoadsorption for Acute Optic Neuritis in Patients with Demyelinating Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) · 2026Pooled it
- A case report of atypical optic neuritis.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2026Article
- An atypical cause of optic neuritis: Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD).Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- MOGAD-Associated Recurrent Optic Neuritis Unresponsive to Corticosteroids: Clinical, Visual Field, and OCT Correlation.Romanian journal of ophthalmologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review discusses the physical examination and diagnostic tests necessary to diagnose optic neuritis (ON) and provides an update on the approach and management of acute ON. A comprehensive search of the PubMed database was conducted, limited to English-language journals and recent publications. A total of 160 articles were initially screened by title, of which 73 articles were included in the narrative synthesis. ON is an inflammation of the optic nerve that can be caused by different systemic and neurological disorders. It is commonly presented as a subacute unilateral painful vision loss, and based on its clinical manifestation, it can be classified as typical or atypical. Atypical ON is bilateral with visual acuity of worse than 20/200 or has an atypical demographic presentation for demyelination, such as a non-Caucasian male with optic disc swelling, for which neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), or other etiologies should be considered. Steroids and immunosuppressants are the main treatment options for ON, and timely treatment initiation is critical to preventing irreversible vision loss, especially in atypical cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.