ArticleNeurology. Genetics2024
Machine Learning Models of Polygenic Risk for Enhanced Prediction of Alzheimer Disease Endophenotypes.
Article in Neurology. Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Data Representation Bias and Conditional Distribution Shift Drive Predictive Performance Disparities in Multi-Population Machine Learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Improved polygenic risk prediction for alzheimer's disease and related dementias using deep learning: age and APOE-stratified analysis.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- A deep ensemble encoder network method for improved polygenic risk score prediction.BioData mining · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- A machine learning framework for classifying dementia risk in mild cognitive impairment: evidence from a Korean genome-wide association study cohort.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Combating Genetic Heterogeneity for Polygenic Prediction of Susceptibility to Brain β-Amyloid Deposition: BeyondNeurology. Genetics · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Methods for Classifying Multiple Sclerosis and Alzheimer's Disease Using Genomic Data.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Discovery of Novel Anti-Acetylcholinesterase Peptides Using a Machine Learning and Molecular Docking Approach.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Article
- Association of biomarkers and Barthel Index with occurrence of age-related adverse health outcomes in individuals with diabetes.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2024Article
- Integrating amyloid and tau imaging with proteomics and genomics in Alzheimer's disease.Cell reports. Medicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Alzheimer disease (AD) has a polygenic architecture, for which genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have helped elucidate sequence variants (SVs) influencing susceptibility. Polygenic risk score (PRS) approaches show promise for generating summary measures of inherited risk for clinical AD based on the effects of Methods: We analyzed combined data from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (n = 1,791) and the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (n = 864). An AD PRS was computed for each participant using the top common SVs obtained from a large AD dementia GWAS. In parallel, ML models were trained using those SV genotypes, with amyloid PET burden as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included amyloid PET positivity and clinical diagnosis (cognitively unimpaired vs impaired). We compared performance between ML-PRS and standard PRS across 100 training sessions with different data splits. In each session, data were split into 80% training and 20% testing, and then five-fold cross-validation was used within the training set to ensure the best model was produced for testing. We also applied permutation importance techniques to assess which genetic factors contributed most to outcome prediction. Results: ML-PRS models outperformed the AD PRS ( Discussion: We found that ML-PRS approaches improved upon standard PRS for prediction of AD endophenotypes, partly related to improved accounting for nonlinear effects of genetic susceptibility alleles. Further adaptations of the ML-PRS framework could help to close the gap of remaining unexplained heritability for AD and therefore facilitate more accurate presymptomatic and early-stage risk stratification for clinical decision-making.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.