Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38250180›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2024

Multimodal and Interdisciplinary Interventions for the Treatment of Localized Provoked Vulvodynia: A Scoping Review of the Literature from 2010 to 2023.

Alex Rains, Krisztina Bajzak, Michelle E Miller, Michelle Swab, Gabrielle S Logan, Victoria A Jackman, Diana L Gustafson

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alex RainsDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-7207-0780
Krisztina BajzakDiscipline of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-3354-2230
Michelle E MillerDiscipline of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada.
Michelle SwabHealth Sciences Library, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6504-4299
Gabrielle S LoganDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7007-9373
Victoria A JackmanFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada.
Diana L GustafsonDivision of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland & Labrador, Canada.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Localized provoked vulvodynia (LPV) is a chronic condition characterized by pain in the vulvar vestibule, which can be provoked by pressure or touch and which is not tied to a clear underlying cause. Research into the etiology of and most appropriate treatment strategy for LPV is still limited. Methods: Using Arksey and O'Malley's model for scoping reviews, we evaluated the research question: what is the current evidence regarding the efficacy/effectiveness of multimodal or interdisciplinary interventions for the treatment of LPV? We collated and analyzed articles from 2010 to 2023 to capture the current research landscape. Results: Our review identified 27 studies, which either compared treatments between classes (eg pharmacologic versus psychologic modalities) or described interdisciplinary treatment programs. We identify several trends in the literature. First, outcome measures are inconsistent between studies, often unvalidated, and may not adequately mirror patient concerns. Second, the absence of appropriate comparator groups in many studies restricts providers' ability to appraise which treatments may be most efficacious. Third, selection bias and demographic homogeneity limit generalizability. Finally, we highlight the need for head-to-head trials of vestibulectomy with other treatments considered first line for vulvodynia management. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to suggest the superiority of one treatment modality for LPV relative to others or to recommend a particular interdisciplinary management strategy. Future research should use a head-to-head design where sham control is impossible, incorporate patient-centered outcome measures, and investigate impacts of treatment among diverse samples of LPV patients.

Indexed as

chronic paindyspareuniainterdisciplinarymultidisciplinarymultimodalvulvodynia

Identifiers

PMID38250180
PMCPMC10798054
OpenAlexW4390886334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.