ReviewFrontiers in digital health2023
Digital patient twins for personalized therapeutics and pharmaceutical manufacturing.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advancing Health Care With Digital Twins: Meta-Review of Applications and Implementation Challenges.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- From signals to systems: the epigenetic-microbiome-mitochondrial axis in IBD pathogenesis.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven digital twins in Pharma 4.0: transforming smart manufacturing, predictive quality assurance, and personalized drug delivery.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026Review
- A decade of innovation in healthcare: Automation, bio-printing and digital twin technologies for personalized therapies.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- A call for principle-based acceptance of synthetic patients: establishing the AI-driven foundation for regulatory submissions.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- A hybrid ML-PBPK digital twin framework for clinically interpretable readmission risk and drug exposure stratification in diabetes.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Design specifications for biomedical virtual twins in engineered adoptive cellular immunotherapies.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- A System Model and Requirements for Transformation to Human-Centric Digital Health.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Review
- Generating Artificial Patients With Reliable Clinical Characteristics Using a Geometry-Based Variational Autoencoder: Proof-of-Concept Feasibility Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Review
- Beyond the gender data gap: co-creating equitable digital patient twins.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
- Subject-Specific Multi-Scale Modeling of the Fate of Inhaled Aerosols.Journal of aerosol science · 2025Article
- Population health management of human phenotype ontology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Reimagining drug regulation in the age of AI: a framework for the AI-enabled Ecosystem for Therapeutics.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- AI-driven transformation of precision medicine: a comprehensive narrative review of key application areas, emerging paradigms, and future directions.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Medical Metaverse: Applications, Challenges, and Future Prospects.Current medical science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital twins are virtual models of physical artefacts that may or may not be synchronously connected, and that can be used to simulate their behavior. They are widely used in several domains such as manufacturing and automotive to enable achieving specific quality goals. In the health domain, so-called digital patient twins have been understood as virtual models of patients generated from population data and/or patient data, including, for example, real-time feedback from wearables. Along with the growing impact of data science technologies like artificial intelligence, novel health data ecosystems centered around digital patient twins could be developed. This paves the way for improved health monitoring and facilitation of personalized therapeutics based on management, analysis, and interpretation of medical data via digital patient twins. The utility and feasibility of digital patient twins in routine medical processes are still limited, despite practical endeavors to create digital twins of physiological functions, single organs, or holistic models. Moreover, reliable simulations for the prediction of individual drug responses are still missing. However, these simulations would be one important milestone for truly personalized therapeutics. Another prerequisite for this would be individualized pharmaceutical manufacturing with subsequent obstacles, such as low automation, scalability, and therefore high costs. Additionally, regulatory challenges must be met thus calling for more digitalization in this area. Therefore, this narrative mini-review provides a discussion on the potentials and limitations of digital patient twins, focusing on their potential bridging function for personalized therapeutics and an individualized pharmaceutical manufacturing while also looking at the regulatory impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.