Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38250012›Full record

SynthesisJournal of pregnancy2024

Drug Utilization Studies in Pregnant Women for Newly Licensed Medicinal Products: A Contribution from IMI ConcePTION.

Sandra Lopez-Leon, Anja Geldhof, Julie Scotto, Keele Wurst, Meritxell Sabidó, Jingping Mo, Ditte Molgaard-Nielsen, Jorieke E H Bergman, Xuan Anh Phi, Sue Jordan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of pregnancy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sandra Lopez-LeonNovartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7504-3441
Anja GeldhofJanssen Biologics B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6476-5526
Julie ScottoBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Keele WurstGlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5177-1759
Meritxell SabidóMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7201-4079
Jingping MoPfizer Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Ditte Molgaard-NielsenNovo Nordisk, Søborg, Denmark.
Jorieke E H BergmanDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3929-3619
Xuan Anh PhiDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Sue JordanFaculty of Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5691-2987

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Studies focusing on safety outcomes typically require large populations to comprehensively characterise the patient groups exposed to the medicines under investigation. However, there is often less information for subpopulations, such as pregnant or breastfeeding women, particularly when new medicines are considered. It is important to understand what information can be obtained from drug utilization studies (DUS) involving pregnant women in the early years postmarketing to provide supportive information for safety studies. The aims of this literature review are to (1) identify and review DUS for new medicines in pregnancy and breastfeeding and (2) list and summarise key information items to be reported in a DUS for new medicines in pregnancy. Methods: To identify postmarketing DUS of new prescription medicines or enantiomers in pregnancy, a systematic literature review was undertaken in PubMed and Embase between January 2015 and June 2022. In addition, the complete database of the ENCePP EU PAS Register was systematically searched to June 2022. Results: We identified 11 published DUS on new medicines in pregnancy from the ENCePP EU PAS Register and none from other sources. No studies on breastfeeding were identified. The 11 identified publications reported the medicine's use for the first 3 to 5 years after marketing approval. No reports assessed utilization in the first 3 years of approval. It was usual to issue interim reports annually (7 studies). All studies concerned conditions managed in ambulatory care (primary care and outpatient facilities) and included some primary care prescribing. Most ( Conclusion: This review summarises key aspects of a DUS for new medicines in pregnancy. DUS for new medicines in pregnancy should be planned before marketing, scheduled for the first 3 to 5 years after release, with annual interim/progress reports, and reported in peer-reviewed journals. By offering detailed information on data sources, exposure timing, prevalence and location, coprescribing, comorbidities, coexposures, and demographics, a DUS will offer a firm foundation for safety studies and will help to contextualize spontaneous reporting of serious adverse events.

Indexed as

Ambulatory CarePregnant PeopleBreast FeedingDatabases, FactualDrug UtilizationFemaleHumansInfantPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38250012
PMCPMC10796183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.