ArticleFrontiers in sports and active living2023
Feasibility of OpenPose markerless motion analysis in a real athletics competition.
Article in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Markerless Motion Capture for Human Movement Estimation Using Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review.Pediatric reports · 2026Review
- Functional Profiling in Paralympic Water Polo Using Deep Learning, Stereo Vision, and Phase-Based Kinematic Analysis: A Pilot Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Markerless Motion-Capture Models for Assessing Football Kinematics During 30 m Long-Pass Tasks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Evaluating markerless biomechanical analysis in a real-world pole vault competition setting.PloS one · 2026Article
- Influence of camera geometry on 3D joint angle estimation in markerless motion capture.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Generating synthetic images of human skeletal motion for pose and kinematics estimation tasks.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Intelligent optimization of track and field teaching using machine learning and wearable sensors.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating Non-Invasive Computer Vision-Based Quantification of Neonatal Movement as a Marker of Development in Preterm Infants: A Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biomechanical and neuromuscular adaptations in joint contributions during loaded countermovement jumps.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Arm Propulsion in Front Crawl Stroke.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Commercial vision sensors and AI-based pose estimation frameworks for markerless motion analysis in sports and exercises: a mini review.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Review
- Deep Learning Analysis of Surgical Video Recordings to Assess Nontechnical Skills.JAMA network open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study tested the performance of OpenPose on footage collected by two cameras at 200 Hz from a real-life competitive setting by comparing it with manually analyzed data in SIMI motion. The same take-off recording from the men's Long Jump finals at the 2017 World Athletics Championships was used for both approaches (markerless and manual) to reconstruct the 3D coordinates from each of the camera's 2D coordinates. Joint angle and Centre of Mass (COM) variables during the final step and take-off phase of the jump were determined. Coefficients of Multiple Determinations (CMD) for joint angle waveforms showed large variation between athletes with the knee angle values typically being higher (take-off leg: 0.727 ± 0.242; swing leg: 0.729 ± 0.190) than those for hip (take-off leg: 0.388 ± 0.193; swing leg: 0.370 ± 0.227) and ankle angle (take-off leg: 0.247 ± 0.172; swing leg: 0.155 ± 0.228). COM data also showed considerable variation between athletes and parameters, with position (0.600 ± 0.322) and projection angle (0.658 ± 0.273) waveforms generally showing better agreement than COM velocity (0.217 ± 0.241). Agreement for discrete data was generally poor with high random error for joint kinematics and COM parameters at take-off and an average ICC across variables of 0.17. The poor agreement statistics and a range of unrealistic values returned by the pose estimation underline that OpenPose is not suitable for in-competition performance analysis in events such as the long jump, something that manual analysis still achieves with high levels of accuracy and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.