ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023
A novel localization device for small pulmonary nodules in thoracoscopic wedge resection with adequate margin distance: a retrospective study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of the RC120 navigation system for the computed tomography-guided localization of pulmonary ground-glass nodules: a prospective study with historical controls.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- A novel localization technique for margin distance assessment of deep-seated small pulmonary nodules in thoracoscopic wedge resection: a retrospective study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- The efficacy of the 4-hook needle localization for pulmonary ground glass nodules: a single-center retrospective analysis.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2025Article
- Use of a novel claw-suture technique for localization of solitary pulmonary nodules: retrospective study and experience from one center.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thoracoscopic wedge resection of small pulmonary nodules (SPNs) is a common surgical procedure. Adequate surgical margin distance is challenging and key to successful resection for malignant nodules. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a novel localization needle in wedge resection for SPNs with adequate margin distance. Methods: A retrospective review of needle localization cases from November 2021 to August 2022 was performed, in which 58 patients who underwent modified computed tomography (CT)-guided needle localization following thoracoscopic wedge resection were enrolled. Nodules were localized by placing a novel device characterized by a 4-hook anchor and a tricolored suture with a scale. The clinical characteristics were collected to evaluate the feasibility of the procedure in obtaining a sufficient margin distance. Results: A total of 68 SPNs were collected, and the median size of SPNs was 10.0 mm with a median depth of 18.9 mm. Needle localization was successful in 65 nodules (95.6%), and all nodules were completely removed. The median resection margin distance was 14 mm (range, 8-26 mm). There were 62 (91.2%) SPNs with a margin distance to tumor size ratio ≥1, 38 (92.7%) SPNs with a depth <20 mm, and 24 (88.9%) SPNs with a depth ≥20 mm, respectively. Regardless of the nodule depth, the median resection margin distances were both 14 mm. Conclusions: This study indicated that modified preoperative CT-guided 4-hook needle with scaled suture localization is a safe, efficient strategy for the wedge resection of SPNs via thoracoscopic surgery. Furthermore, it was considerably advantageous for obtaining adequate margins distance, especially for deep nodules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.