ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023
Therapeutic effects of multidisciplinary individualized treatment for COVID-19 patients: the experience of a supporting medical team in Wuhan.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia, Opportunistic Candida krusei Infection, and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Treated with Bosentan: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2025Article
- The Prevalence and Associated Factors of Post-COVID-19 Fatigue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The sudden outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has brought people around the world into an abyss of suffering. At that time, there were no clear and effective means for the treatment of the virus. We prepared a medical team consisted of specialists in critical care, respiratory diseases, infections, gastroenterology, endocrinology, cardiology, cerebrovascular diseases, nephrology, rehabilitation, psychology, and nutrition. This study shared our multidisciplinary treatment experience in treating patients with COVID-19. Methods: Patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 swab test were divided into three groups: ordinary cases, severe cases and critical cases. Every patient received the multi-disciplinary comprehensive and individualized tailored treatment based on the specific situation of each patient. Patients' medical records, epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, radiological characteristics, Borg dyspnea score, Barthel index, self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) as well as treatment and outcome data were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the 90 patients was 61.88±15.25 years. Some patients without underlying disease had developed comorbidities such as hyperglycemia (24, 26.67%) and hypertension (9, 10%). With multidisciplinary individualized treatment, the patients' albumin level and Barthel index score increased significantly, while glucose level, blood pressure, and Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002), Borg scale, and SAS values significantly decreased at discharge. The in-hospital mortality rate was 4.44%. However, there was still a gap in Nutrition Risk Screening, Borg dyspnea score and Barthel index between the critical cases and the ordinary and severe cases at discharge. We observed that the patients with more severe disease had significantly higher age, rates of hypertension, and mortality. The median hospitalization time of discharged patients was 19 days [interquartile range (IQR), 9.0-20.0 days]. Conclusions: Multidisciplinary collaboration and individualized treatment could effectively improve the general status of patients with different severity of COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.