ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2023
A retrospective analysis of prognostic factors and treatment choices in small cell lung cancer with liver metastasis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Successful application of whole-liver irradiation in a patient with small cell lung cancer with diffuse liver metastasis: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Research progress on immune tolerance mechanisms in liver metastatic tumors and the "Liver-metastasis-oriented shared-mechanism therapeutic strategy" approach.Medical review (2021) · 2026Review
- Impact of hepatic radiotherapy on survival and safety outcomes in small cell lung cancer patients with liver metastases: a retrospective study.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Progression and Metastasis of Lung Cancer: Clinical Features, Molecular Mechanisms, and Clinical Managements.MedComm · 2025Review
- Article
- First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy in Taiwanese patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of post‑progression survival after chemoradiotherapy on overall survival in limited‑disease small cell lung cancer.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Regulatory T cells in liver metastases: emerging and divergent roles in tumour progression.eGastroenterology · 2025Review
- Prognostic value of baseline clinicopathological characteristics in first-line chemotherapy ± immunotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is characterized by high aggressiveness and early dissemination, with the liver being the most common site of metastasis. Although it has been established that the prognosis for SCLC with liver metastasis is exceedingly poor, comprehensive data on clinical features, prognostic factors, treatment options, and outcomes of this patient population remain limited. This retrospective study aims to examine the clinicopathological features and current treatment landscape and to identify prognostic factors associated with SCLC with liver metastasis in real-world settings. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data on SCLC patients with liver metastasis at initial diagnosis between January 1, 2013, and January 1, 2022. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were employed to estimate the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression models were utilized to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: A total of 349 patients were included in the study, with 97.7% of patients exhibiting pure SCLC and 42.4% of patients presenting with concomitant bone metastasis. Approximately one-fourth of the patients had metastases in ≥3 organs, and 18.9% of patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2. The median OS was 10.97 months (95% CI: 9.88-12.06) for those who received first-line therapy (n=286). Of these, 263 patients were treated with chemotherapy, showing a median OS of 11.37 months. Furthermore, 43.8% of patients received second-line treatment, and 81 patients proceeded to third-line treatment. ECOG PS ≥2 and mixed-SCLC were identified as independent adverse prognostic factors in SCLC with liver metastasis, whereas treatments including systemic treatment alone or in combination with local radiotherapy were associated with better prognoses. Conclusions: This retrospective study substantiated that ECOG PS ≥2 and mixed SCLC are independent predictors of poor prognosis for SCLC with liver metastasis. Additionally, different treatment strategies can improve the survival of this patient population, with chemotherapy currently being the main treatment option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.